Home / SMSFs / SMSF strategies and checklists / Tax hike on super balances above $3 million: Is it time to rethink our retirement savings vehicles?

Tax hike on super balances above $3 million: Is it time to rethink our retirement savings vehicles?

Important:

Division 296 has not yet been legislated, and on 13 October 2025 the government announced changes to the proposed legislation.

The details contained in this guide reflect the original proposed legislation.

Please refer to our main guide for details of the new proposed Division 296 legislation (including calculator).

Another year and yet another announcement from the Australian government on intended changes to our superannuation system! No wonder the overall confidence with the retirement savings incentives in Australia continues to decline.

A quick look at the proposed changes

Commencing 1 July 2025, the tax rate levied on super fund earnings for members with balances above $3 million will double from 15% to 30%.

Some of the key points to note with these proposals include:

  • The proposed changes are not designed to apply a specific limit on super fund account balances. They are designed to apply a higher rate of tax on fund earnings for balances above $3 million. 
  • The higher tax rate applies to future earnings from 1 July 2025 and it will not be retrospective. However, there may be a “retrospective” effect for super funds carrying existing unrealised capital gains on fund assets.
  • The $3 million cap is applied per member and not per fund.
  • The proposed increase in tax payable only applies on earnings above the $3 million threshold.
  • The $3 million threshold will not be indexed for inflation, so more people will be subject to the 30% tax rate over time as super balances increase.

Although these proposed changes apply to most superannuation fund types, they will have a much greater effect on the members of SMSF’s due to their higher average member balances and the investments held within these funds.

We look forward to seeing the finer details on how the government plans to implement these changes for their own defined benefit funds and even the older Parliamentary Contributory Superannuation Scheme.

2026 SMSF calendar

SMSF calendar

Our free calendar includes due dates for important documents plus suggested dates for trustee meetings and other strategic issues for your SMSF.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
First name*

Why the need for change?

Australia’s superannuation system is currently structured to provide generous tax concessions that encourage personal retirement savings. These retirement savings can then be used to provide a level of self-sufficiency in our retirement; effectively reducing the ongoing reliance on government support.

However, these tax concessions are often used by people with the means to save more than required for their retirement; using super as an effective tax planning tool.

When we see individual SMSF balances that exceed $400 million, most people would question just how equitable the overall system really is and whether the tax concessions given to these mega funds are still fair.

Do we need to rethink our retirement savings strategies?

For most of us, there will be no need to change what we are doing. However, if you already hold more than the new proposed $3 million cap in super, or will in years to come,  you may need to consider whether a super fund is still the most appropriate vehicle to hold all of your retirement savings or whether other investment vehicles should be used in conjunction with your super fund.

It may be that we start to see compulsory super contributions and tax-deductible contributions continuing to flow into the superannuation environment, but monies that would otherwise have been contributed to super after tax (non-concessional contributions) moved into other investment structures to limit the effect of the higher tax rate on balances above the $3 million cap.

These other investment vehicles may not receive the overall tax concessions given to super funds, but they are also not subject to the usual contribution limits or investment restrictions that apply within the super fund environment.

SMSF investing

Free eBook

SMSF investing essentials

Learn the essential facts about the SMSF investment rules, how to create an investment strategy (including templates) and how to give your strategy a healthcheck.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
First name*

What other options exist?

Investment structures to consider alongside your super fund include companies, trusts or partnerships. In some cases, these alternatives can provide a benefit from both a taxation perspective and also for asset protection.

It is also worth noting that, in some cases, simply investing in your own name can work. Keep in mind that the first $18,200 of income earned is free from income tax.

Investment companies

  • Earnings are taxed at 30% (for most).
  • Profits DO NOT need to be paid out each year. They can be held within the company and used for further investment or other purposes. In some cases, this could assist with intergenerational wealth transfer.
  • When profits are distributed, they are paid to shareholders as dividends.
  • Dividends paid out can include franking/imputation credits for tax already paid by the company and ensures that you don’t then pay personal tax on these same amounts.
  • If your tax rate is below the company rate, you may be eligible for a tax refund.

Investment trusts – unit trust

  • Profits need to be paid out each year. If profits remain unpaid, and held within the trust, then tax issues can arise.
  • Unit trusts are set up with identifiable unit holders, with each unit representing an interest in the underlying trust assets.
  • Trust profits are paid to the unit holders, and this can provide a tax advantage where those recipients have little or no other income.
  • In some cases, trusts can assist with both asset protection and intergenerational wealth transfer.

Investment trusts – family (discretionary) trust

  • Profits need to be paid out each year. If profits remain unpaid, and held within the trust, then tax issues can arise.
  • Family trusts often do not have unit holders; they are discretionary, whereby the trustee of the trust can elect who is to receive any distribution.
  • Beneficiaries or class of beneficiaries are usually set out in the trust deed of the trust.
  • Profits are paid to the beneficiaries of the trust by way of distributions; in many cases, this can provide a tax advantage where those recipients have little or no other income.
  • In some cases, trusts can assist with both asset protection and intergenerational wealth transfer.

Individuals

  • Tax is levied at marginal tax rates, which range from 0% to 45% (excluding Medicare)
  • The first $18,200 in earnings could be tax free where you have no other income. For example, a term deposit of $360,000 earning a 5% per year return would provide interest of $18,000.
  • Keep in mind that you are the legal owner of the asset, and these assets are not protected from legal action.

Member Q&A

Watch a Q&A which explores how the new tax will impact retirement planning.

Q: How will the new $3 million threshold tax impact retirement planning?

A: There are lots of similar questions on this topic. First of all, I believe that SMSF liquidity and SMSF diversification will become even more important. Now, the new tax they’re talking about from 1 July 2025, the Division 296 tax, is a tax applied to the individual personally. You’re responsible individually to pay that, not the fund. But if you want your fund to pay that, which I’m thinking quite a few people will, you need to think about does the fund have sufficient cash flow, liquidity, and diversification to meet that?

We also might need to consider if a super fund is the only tool, the only retirement savings vehicle that we use? Or do we use other things as well? Do we think about family trusts or companies? Do we think about investing in our own names? In regards to impacting retirement planning, instead of all retirement savings going to super, do we now start to think about using other vehicles at the same time? If you think you’re going to go above the three million, it’s not really hard to estimate what that additional tax might be.

We ran a webinar on this and go and have a look at that. The formula is all there. It’s not difficult to try and project what that might look like.

The second major point I want to make is that ongoing account balances would need to be reviewed more frequently. We’ll need to look at them more frequently so that if we are approaching balances exceeding three million, do we make a withdrawal? Can we manage that to have a lower overall tax on the amounts above the three million? I think ongoing account balance maintenance is going to become more of an issue because your balances will move up and down and you may need to make some withdrawals to stay within limits.

If we have other retirement vehicles, we might be able to have a lower overall tax. Remember that the first $18,000 that we receive as individual income is tax-free. A family trust for investing where we can distribute profits to who we want, all of those other retirement savings vehicles might be worth considering to sit along our SMSF, alongside our super fund, which might give us a overall better outcome.

The last point that I want to make here to answer the specific question about retirement planning is you now need to give greater consideration to what will happen on the death of a spouse and whether the death benefits are going to be paid to the spouse as a reversionary pension. If that’s the case, it could easily take you above the $3 million cap when you think about your own balances as well. Just something to consider.

Now, in regards to the other questions that came through – Has anything further happened? – the bill that covers this was introduced into the Parliament on 30th of November 2023 and that was the first reading. The second reading, so when they come back after recommendations have been made, has been moved. We’re not sure, or I’m not sure at this point in time when that’s going to be reintroduced into Parliament.

There was not a lot of change from the initial drafting of the rules that was tailored in Parliament. The only change, I suppose that we looked at and we were hoping for was the removal of taxation of unrealised gains, and we were hoping that the bill might contain some form of indexation. Neither of those two things appeared in that bill. At the moment, no real change, apart from the fact that it’s had its first reading in Parliament.

The proposed start date is still 1 July 2025. Therefore, the 2026 is the first year this will apply.

Nothing further that we have at this stage. The information contained on the website in those articles is certainly relevant, and I’ve put there the webinar that we ran on that in April 2023, the things that you need to know.

The bottom line

The proposed tax increase on super balances above $3 million has come as a surprise to many.

If you are concerned about how these proposed changes could affect you and the amount of tax that you may be required to pay, consider what changes you could make to get the best outcome for you and your family.

Remember though, tax is only one aspect that needs to be considered.

Access independent expert SMSF guidance

Make the most of your SMSF with a SuperGuide membership
  • Experts detail SMSF specific strategies
  • SMSF checklists simplify admin and compliance
  • Comprehensive SMSF rules in plain language
  • Newsletters and webinars keep you on top of the current rules
  • Interactive tools and calculators give you power to plan
  • Step-by-step guides help you put plans into action

Find out more

About the author

Related topics,

IMPORTANT: All information on SuperGuide is general in nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether any information on SuperGuide is appropriate to you before acting on it. If SuperGuide refers to a financial product you should obtain the relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) or seek personal financial advice before making any investment decisions. Comments provided by readers that may include information relating to tax, superannuation or other rules cannot be relied upon as advice. SuperGuide does not verify the information provided within comments from readers. Learn more

© Copyright SuperGuide 2008-25. Copyright for this guide belongs to SuperGuide Pty Ltd, and cannot be reproduced without express and specific consent. Learn more

Response

  1. Mark Bradbury Avatar
    Mark Bradbury

    Hi Garth, I think that we need to be careful about calling this as a 30% tax rate as this will never really be the case. There are some very good articles on the Firstlinks website detailing the real calculation methods and the fact that it amounts to an additional up to 15% tax surcharge on the Super earnings particularly as it’s only on the proportion the the earnings deemed (including unrealised gains) to be allocated from those assets that are above the $3M mark, ie only 25% of income if the balance was $4M.
    It may also be the case that 0% tax is being paid on the base income generated if that income is generated from a pension account that has grown to be in excess of $3M, although unlikely at the moment definitely not impossible in future years especially if starting at $1.9M next year and drawing down minimum pension amounts. I estimate my own account will be there within five years.
    Regards Mark

Leave a Reply