Join now
Log in
Home / SMSFs / SMSF strategies / The $3 million super tax cap: What to consider with 1 year to go

The $3 million super tax cap: What to consider with 1 year to go

Garth McNally
Garth McNally

In just over 12 months’ time, the new tax rules that apply to earnings on super balances above $3 million will commence. That may seem a long way away, but for those of you considering changes to your SMSF, that time frame could already be rather tight!

Read more about super tax breaks to be reduced for accounts with more than $3 million.

As you would expect, there has been a considerable amount of press coverage on this issue, but what seems to be lacking is attention to the key issues that SMSF trustees and members need to consider in the time leading up to these changes.

So, let’s look at some of these key issues now.

Do I withdraw part of my super balance and invest elsewhere?

First of all, you can only make a withdrawal from your super fund when you have met a condition of release that allows access, such as reaching age 65 or retiring after your preservation age. If you have not yet met a condition of release that allows access to your benefits, then this really is a moot point.

Read more about accessing super and all of the conditions of release.

For those over preservation age, but not yet allowed full access to super benefits, you may need to commence a transition-to-retirement pension (TTR) instead. This would allow a maximum amount of 10% to be withdrawn from your TTR pension each year.

Due to the 10% limit, you may need to consider starting a TRIS this financial year so you can gain access to 10% of the pension balance in the current 2024 financial year. Then you can draw a further 10% in the 2025 financial year, before the changes commence.

Also, before you go ahead and withdraw super to invest elsewhere, you should first look at what you are trying to achieve.

Is this only to save tax? If so, keep in mind that the new tax applies only to super fund earnings on balances above $3 million. And the rate of tax is 15%. Will withdrawing and investing through other entities or in your own name result in a tax rate lower than 15%?

It would be prudent to carry out detailed financial modelling before you make any changes to your existing position to ensure you would be better off by investing elsewhere!

Do I keep existing fund assets?

Following on from the comments above, if you are looking to withdraw part of your super balance you need to consider if your super fund has the required liquidity available to allow the withdrawal to take place.

In most situations, super funds would need to sell assets to fund any large member benefit payment so you would need to consider the relevant transaction costs or tax that may become payable as a result of the asset sale.

You should also consider the time required to sell large fund assets. For instance, property assets take time to market, sell and then receive the sale proceeds. So, if this is a strategy you plan to use, think about when you need to start the sale process.

One aspect of the new laws that has caused the most concern is that it applies to unrealised capital gains as well as realised capital gains. This is something new to the Australian taxation system whereby tax can become payable BEFORE a transaction occurs to realise an asset.

Some SMSFs may already have in place plans that could significantly increase the value of a fund asset, for instance property improvements. If this is relevant to you or your SMSF, it may be worth seeking professional advice around the most appropriate course of action.

Member balance equalisation

About the author

Garth McNally
Garth McNally
Garth has worked in the Australian Superannuation industry for over 20 years with a specific focus on self-managed super funds. He provides ongoing support and training to individuals as well as to professionals working in the superannuation area, including advisers, accountants and lawyers. He is a regular contributor to industry publications and to the leading professional bodies including Chartered Accountants Australia & New Zealand (CA ANZ).
Related topics,

IMPORTANT: All information on SuperGuide is general in nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether any information on SuperGuide is appropriate to you before acting on it. If SuperGuide refers to a financial product you should obtain the relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) or seek personal financial advice before making any investment decisions. Comments provided by readers that may include information relating to tax, superannuation or other rules cannot be relied upon as advice. SuperGuide does not verify the information provided within comments from readers. Learn more

© Copyright SuperGuide 2008-25. Copyright for this guide belongs to SuperGuide Pty Ltd, and cannot be reproduced without express and specific consent. Learn more

Responses

  1. mac1@possumology.com Avatar
    mac1@possumology.com

    You say:
    “Is this only to save tax? If so, keep in mind that the new tax applies only to super fund earnings on balances above $3 million. And the rate of tax is 15%. Will withdrawing and investing through other entities or in your own name result in a tax rate lower than 15%?”

    But it is not that simple – the new 15% tax includes unrealised capital gains whereas this would not apply to investments in your own name. Over 15 years the earning rate of my SMSF (which does include unrealised capital gains) has averaged around 8.4% but the annual return has ranged from -4.5% to over 30% (once!)

    In a year where there is a large share portfolio value rise, the 15% tax on this could easily be much larger than even 45% tax on the ACTUAL taxable income (dividends and realised capital gains).

    Although you can carry forward losses you CANNOT use a large capital loss to claim back tax already paid – so if FY25-26 is a really good year on the market you are immediately hit with a large tax bill – conversely if FY24-25 was the really good year, and there was a correction in FY25-26, then you start off the new system with a tax loss buffer.

    Not a good scenario for sensible tax forecasting or sensible investing strategies when the actual tax involved can be so subject to the closing prices on each 30 June market close. But possibly a good scenario for market manipulation by the really big boys?!

    1. SuperGuide Avatar
      SuperGuide

      Thank you for your comment.

      Yes the tax does capture unrealised capital gains and this is a common criticism of how it will be implemented.

      Keep in mind only the portion of gains attributed to a balance above $3 million attracts the additional tax.

      For example, if the total balance was $3,100,000 at the end of the financial year, then approximately 3.2% of the balance is above $3 million. The tax will therefore apply to 3.2% of the calculated earnings for that financial year.

      In years when the earnings calculated are negative (including because of capital losses), the loss can be carried forward to offset taxable earnings in future years. These transferable negative earnings will accumulate if an individual’s total superannuation balance was higher than $3 million either:

      • immediately before the financial year began, or
      • at the end of the financial year.

      Implementation of this tax is certainly not perfect, however it has been designed this way so that the ATO can use existing reporting received from super funds about members’ total super balance to charge it. Other solutions would have required significant additional fund reporting at huge expense, which was not considered equitable or worthwhile when the new tax will affect such a small proportion of super fund members.

Leave a Reply