Home / How super works / Super rules / Super tax breaks to be reduced for accounts with more than $3 million

Super tax breaks to be reduced for accounts with more than $3 million

Important: Although this proposed measure is scheduled to begin from 1 July 2025, it had not become law before 1 December 2024, and may not be passed before the 2025 Federal Election.

In February 2023, in an effort to head off a bruising ‘super war’ ahead of the May 2023 Budget, the Albanese Government announced it planned to introduce a new earnings tax for people with more than $3 million in super.

On 3 October, Treasury released draft legislation and invited responses in a narrow window up until 18 October 2023. Many industry insiders take this limited consultation as a signal that the government is unlikely to budge on the substance of its proposed legislation.

Background

Currently, earnings from super in accumulation phase are taxed at the concessional rate of up to 15% while earnings from super in retirement phase are tax free. This will continue for the 99.5% of Australians with less than $3 million in super.

In February 2023, Labor announced that from 1 July 2025 the concessional tax rate applied to future earnings that relate to the portion of an individual’s super balance above $3 million would double to 30%. This is still well below the top marginal tax rate of 45% and would bring the taxation of super for wealthier individuals in line with the corporate rate. However, the draft legislation reveals that the operation of the new tax will not be this simple or clear cut – more on that later.

Despite recent speculation, the government does not propose a limit on the size of superannuation balances.

Also, the government’s proposal does not change the concessional tax rate on contributions to your super account made by your employer or by you before tax.

More controversially, treasurer Chalmers said he had no plans to index the $3 million threshold at which the higher tax rates will apply. This means more people will be above the threshold over time as super balances increase.

“My intention is not to index it because we need to make superannuation more sustainable over time,” he said.

So, what does this all mean?

Summary of the proposed changes

The new measure, which we now know will be called Division 296 tax, will apply to individuals with total superannuation balances (TSBs) over $3 million at the end of a financial year. Contrary to the government’s initial announcement, it is not a doubling of super earnings tax. It is a completely new tax applied to a newly defined concept of ‘earnings’ at the rate of 15%.

The existing 15% tax on earnings for accounts in the accumulation phase (excluding untaxed constitutionally protected funds) is applied only to the taxable income of the fund. This includes dividends, rent, realised capital gains, interest and so on. Capital gains discounts, franking credits and other deductions reduce the actual internal tax rate of APRA regulated funds to an average of 7%.

Requiring large funds to apply a different rate of tax to the assets of the fund supporting members with TSBs above $3 million would be impractical if not impossible, so the proposed Division 296 tax is the compromise solution. It applies not to the taxable income of the fund, like the existing earnings tax, but instead to a portion of the change in the affected individual’s account balance. As widely criticised, this means the tax captures unrealised capital gains.

It will apply only to earnings related to the portion of an individual’s account balance that is above $3 million. This means if your balance is only a little over the threshold, a correspondingly small proportion of your earnings will attract extra tax.

Broadly speaking, the proposed changes are as follows:

About the author

Related topics,

IMPORTANT: All information on SuperGuide is general in nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether any information on SuperGuide is appropriate to you before acting on it. If SuperGuide refers to a financial product you should obtain the relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) or seek personal financial advice before making any investment decisions. Comments provided by readers that may include information relating to tax, superannuation or other rules cannot be relied upon as advice. SuperGuide does not verify the information provided within comments from readers. Learn more

© Copyright SuperGuide 2008-25. Copyright for this guide belongs to SuperGuide Pty Ltd, and cannot be reproduced without express and specific consent. Learn more

Responses

  1. Des SOARES Avatar
    Des SOARES

    How will this change affect super funds that own property? Does this mean property will need to be valued each year rather than every 2-3 years at present?

    1. Kate Crawford Avatar
      Kate Crawford

      Hi Des, There is no change to valuation practices specifically required by the new tax.
      However, as many SMSFs value property every three years their trustees will need to consider if more frequent valuation would be desirable – perhaps to avoid lumpy tax liabilities. APRA regulated funds (non SMSFs) are required to comply with the Prudential Standard for Investment Governance under which APRA expects funds to revalue assets on at least a quarterly basis.

  2. mac1@possumology.com Avatar
    mac1@possumology.com

    For the moment, disregarding arguments about the fairness or otherwise of increasing the tax for those fortunate/diligent enough to have built a super balance of $5M+ or $3M+, the one thing that nobody seems to be commenting on is the actual mechanism for implementing this – which is not only unfair but, it seems to me, could have profound and unanticipated effects on ASX trading markets at EOFY.

    The government commentary presents this as simply increasing the tax rate from 15% to 30% for the proportion of your super balance over $3M BUT THIS IS NOT WHAT IS ACTUALLY PROPOSED.

    Within the super fund the 15% tax rate applies to the fund’s taxable income (assessable income less ECPI) now, if we took the government top level overview at face value, someone with a super balance of say $6M (ie 50% of their balance is above $3M) might expect 50% of their fund’s taxable income to be taxed at 15% and the other 50% to be taxed at 30%.

    HOWEVER the government, recognising that this would be a nightmare to actually administer if they required the actual Funds to apply this system, has left the actual super tax system unchanged and decided to levy this as an additional tax at the personal level. The real problem is that, to come up with a simple method of calculating the personal fund income to tax, they have decided to tax Fund EARNINGS – which they have defined as the increase in a person’s super BALANCE.

    Yes, this means that you will get taxed not only on capital gains on shares sold but also on UNREALISED capital gains. Given that the annual performance of the ASX can be much greater or less than the average return this will result in a very lumpy tax impost dependant on the 30 June closing prices at the beginning and end of the FY.

    Anyone who invests in shares with low liquidity with will be familiar with the fact that the closing price of these shares can be moved significantly by even small orders at the end of the day. As a long term investor in such a company you regard this as insignificant “noise” overlying the long term performance but, under this new scheme, a member whose fund has a significant holding in such an illiquid company could face a large variation in personal tax if someone buys/sells a quite small position at close of play on 30 June.

    Since often the reason for the low liquidity is retained ownership by the founders – they could have a real problem if their holdings are held in their super and the EOFY closing price changes significantly.

    I could go on and on about the unforseen problems I can see here – but I suspect it is worth an article of it’s own.

Leave a Reply