Home / SMSFs / SMSF investing / Most popular investments for SMSFs / SMSF investing: 20 most popular LICs/LITs

SMSF investing: 20 most popular LICs/LITs

This guide lists the 20 most popular LICs/LITs invested in by SMSFs as of 30 June 2026. We thank Class, an SMSF administration software company, who have provided the data used in this article.

See also:

Listed investment companies (LICs) and listed investment trusts (LITs) are like managed funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in that your money is pooled with other investors in a professionally managed portfolio of assets.

All allow individual investors to achieve greater diversification than they could on their own. They are also an effective way to plug holes in your investment portfolio through exposure to asset classes and market sectors you might otherwise find difficult to access.

As the name suggests, LICs use a company structure, while LITs are trusts that generally take the form of an Australian Managed Investment Scheme (MIS).

A venerable history

LICs are the grandaddies of the Australian listed managed investment scene.

The two biggest LICs by value, Australian Foundation Investment Company (AFIC) and Argo Investments, have been around since 1928 and 1946, respectively. Both are long-term investors in Australian shares with a buy-and-hold philosophy, which keeps costs low.

Like ETFs, LICs and LITs are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and can be bought and sold as easily as ordinary shares.

Unlike ETFs, which are mostly passive index funds, LICs and LITs are actively managed by the fund manager who picks the underlying investments. This means they tend to be slightly more expensive than index ETFs.

A key difference between LICs and ETFs is that LICs are closed-ended investments with a fixed number of shares on issue. This provides stability as shares can only be traded between willing buyers and sellers.

This structure also means LICs tend to trade at a premium or discount to their net tangible assets (NTA), depending on their current share price. Trading at a discount can mean issues with performance, but it also reflects competition from ETFs and low-cost passive index funds.

By comparison, ETFs are open-ended, which means units in the fund can be created or redeemed according to investor demand without the share price being affected. As a result, ETFs always trade close to their NTA.

Manage your SMSF smarter – for free

Access practical, independent guides and checklists to help you run your fund with confidence with a free SuperGuide account.

Find out more

SMSF investors have long been big supporters of LICs because they offer a simple, easy-to-trade, low-cost way to diversify. While LICs and LITs traditionally focus on Australian shares, newer LICs and LITs offer access to global shares, income, infrastructure and property.

This is reflected in the fact that two of the top three most popular LICs with SMSF investors are the long-standing Australian share investors, Australian Foundation Investment Company and Argo.

According to Class, these two funds are held by 17.0% and 13.2% of SMSFs that hold LICs/LITs. Between them, they account for more than 19% of the total value of SMSF LIC/LIT investments.

Second on the list is the MCP Master Income Trust, held by 15.7% of SMSFs with LICs/LITs and accounting for 5.8% of the total value. It offers exposure to the Australian corporate loans market.

Also popular is Wilson Asset Management (WAM), which has three funds in the top 10: WAM Capital in fourth, WAM Leaders in sixth (both Australian shares) and WAM Global in tenth (international shares).

SMSFs are also using LICs and LITs for alternative sources of income. Seven of the top 20 are income-focused, spanning corporate loans, credit, real estate debt and high-yield Australian shares.

Fifth on the list, the L1 Long Short Fund is an absolute return fund that invests in Australian and global shares and derivatives. Absolute return funds aim to provide a positive return to investors in all market conditions.

The top 20 list below is ranked by the percentage of SMSFs holding these LICs/LITs, rather than the percentage each security makes up of total SMSF investments in LICs/LITs, although both figures are provided in the table.

RankSecurity codeFund% of funds with LIC/LITs that hold this security% of total SMSF LIC/LIT investments
1AFIAustralian Foundation Investment Company Limited (AFIC)17.0%10.3%
2MXTMCP Master Income Trust15.7%5.8%
3ARGArgo Investments Limited13.2%9.0%
4WAMWAM Capital10.2%3.7%
5LSFL1 Long Short Fund10.0%6.2%
6WLEWAM Leaders Limited9.2%4.7%
7MFFMFF Capital Investments Limited7.8%6.9%
8PGFPM Capital Global Opportunities Fund Limited7.5%4.5%
9GCIGryphon Capital Income Trust7.0%2.8%
10WGBWAM Global Limited6.4%2.1%
11PL8Plato Income Maximiser Limited6.2%3.3%
12PCIPerpetual Credit Income Trust4.9%1.6%
13KKCKKR Credit Income Fund4.9%1.3%
14QRIQualitas Real Estate Income Fund4.8%1.7%
15WQGWCM Global Growth Limited4.6%2.1%
16MA1Monash Absolute Investment Company Limited4.5%1.4%
17MOTMCP Income Opportunities Trust4.4%1.3%
18DJWDjerriwarrh Investments Limited4.4%1.8%
19BKIBKI Investment Company Limited4.0%2.6%
20PICPerpetual Investment Company3.9%1.5%
Total (Percentage that these 20 securities make up of total SMSF investments in LIC/LITs)74.6%

Source: Class. Data as at 30 June 2026. Data sourced from 198,898 SMSFs that use Class software.

It’s worth noting that the 20 most popular LICs/LITs represent 74.6% of total SMSF LIC/LIT investments, indicating the relatively shallow market for these investments compared with managed funds and ETFs. The equivalent figure is 46.4% for ETFs and 13.3% for managed funds.

Get independent guidance and practical tools to help you manage your SMSF confidently, stay compliant and make informed decisions as a trustee.

Create free account

Trusted by 5,000+ members · Independent · Ad-free
Prefer full access? See what’s included in membership.

About the author

Related topics, ,

IMPORTANT: All information on SuperGuide is general in nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether any information on SuperGuide is appropriate to you before acting on it. If SuperGuide refers to a financial product you should obtain the relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) or seek personal financial advice before making any investment decisions. Comments provided by readers that may include information relating to tax, superannuation or other rules cannot be relied upon as advice. SuperGuide does not verify the information provided within comments from readers. Learn more

© Copyright SuperGuide 2008-26. Copyright for this guide belongs to SuperGuide Pty Ltd, and cannot be reproduced without express and specific consent. Learn more

Leave a Reply