Home / Super booster / Super and tax / Division 296 super tax explained (including calculator)

Division 296 super tax explained (including calculator)

Important: Although this proposed measure is scheduled to begin from 1 July 2025, it is not yet law. The details below may change if legislation is amended or not passed.

If the Albanese Government has their way, a new tax will be charged on investment growth that occurs this financial year in super balances above $3 million (Division 296 tax).

If your balance is above $3 million on 30 June 2026, you will be among the first to receive an assessment.

The government recognises that the tax rates on super earnings of 15% in the accumulation phase and 0% in the retirement phase provide a significant concession for most taxpayers. Applying additional tax on the growth of larger balances is intended to better target that concession.

Let our explainer and calculator cut through the jargon.

Who does it apply to?

Division 296 tax applies to the taxable super earnings of individuals with total superannuation balances (TSBs) over $3 million at the end of a financial year. If your TSB is below $3 million on 30 June, the tax does not apply, even if you have made withdrawals to bring your balance below the threshold.

Retirement planning for beginners

Free eBook

Retirement planning for beginners

Our easy-to-follow guide walks you through the fundamentals, giving you the confidence to start your own retirement plans.

"*" indicates required fields

First name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The $3 million threshold will not be indexed (at least initially), which means more people will be liable for Division 296 tax over time as super balances increase.

The threshold applies to individuals, so couples can still have up to $6 million in super and not be liable for additional tax. Individual application also means the total value of a self-managed super fund (SMSF) may be above $3 million but if no members have an individual TSB above the threshold then no Division 296 applies.

How is it calculated?

Division 296 tax at the rate of 15% applies to the earnings attributed to the portion of your balance that is above $3 million. This means if your balance is only a little over the threshold, a correspondingly small proportion of your earnings will attract extra tax.

Division 296 tax = 15% x taxable earnings x taxable proportion

To calculate the proportion, the below formula is used and rounded to two decimal places:

Taxable proportion

[(your TSB at the end of the year – $3 million)/ your TSB at the end of the year] x 100

The result is expressed as a percentage.

Example: Proportion

Runi has a total super balance of $4.5 million on 30 June 2026.

The proportion of her balance above $3 million is:

[($4.5 million – $3 million)/$4.5 million] x 100

=$1.5 million/$4.5 million x 100

= 33.33%

To calculate ‘earnings’ your 30 June Total Super Balance (TSB) from the prior year is subtracted from your most recent ‘adjusted’ 30 June TSB. Your adjusted TSB is your total balance with the year’s net contributions subracted and withdrawals added. Adjusting the figure this way ensures that only investment growth is captured, disregarding contributions and withdrawals.

However, as widely criticised, the calculation does capture the increase in value of assets that have not been sold (unrealised capital gains). Capital gains are not otherwise taxed in super or other contexts until the asset is sold and the gain is ‘realised’.

If your adjusted TSB or TSB from last 30 June is below $3 million, that figure is replaced with $3 million.

Example: Previous TSB above $3 million

James’ adjusted TSB on 30 June 2026 is $3.4 million. His TSB on 30 June 2025 was $3.1 million.

James’ taxable earnings for 2025-26 are $300,000 ($3.4 million – $3.1 million).

Example: Previous TSB below $3 million

Sunita’s adjusted TSB on 30 June 2026 is $3.1 million. Her TSB on 30 June 2025 was $2.8 million.

Sunita’s taxable earnings for 2025-26 are $100,000 ($3.1 million – $3 million).

Because her TSB on 30 June 2025 was below $3 million, the $3 million figure is subtracted in its place. This ensures she pays tax only on the portion of her earnings that brought her balance above the $3 million threshold.

Division 296 calculator

We know wading through the numbers alone isn’t everyone’s idea of a great time, so we’ve put together a simple calculator to estimate your Division 296 tax liability for 2025-26.

This information should be used for general guidance only and does not constitute personal advice.

Also note that the legislation for this policy has still not been finalised.

What if I have investment losses?

While there is no way to recoup tax that is paid on capital gains that are never realised, there is a mechanism to carry forward losses. When the result of the annual earnings calculation is negative, this loss is subtracted from earnings in future years.

In 2025-26 there are no prior losses to carry forward because the tax has not applied in previous years. However, if you experience a loss in 2025-26 it will be carried forward to offset gains in 2026-27. Any portion of the that was not used to offset gains is carried forward again into future years.

Example: Carried forward losses

Mohammed’s adjusted super balance on 30 June 2026 is $3.1 million and his total super balance on 30 June 2025 was $3.2 million.

Mohammed’s taxable earnings for 2025-26 are negative (-$100,000) and he doesn’t need to pay any Division 296 tax.

If his taxable earnings in 2026-27 are $80,000, then $80,000 of his carried forward loss from 2025-26 will be consumed. He won’t pay Division 296 tax for 2026-27 because previous losses fully offset his gains.

The remaining $20,000 loss will be carried forward again to offset earnings in 2027-28.

Collection of the tax

Those who have been liable for Division 293 tax in the past will be familiar with the assessment and payment process that is being proposed. The ATO will send assessments to affected individuals, who may then choose to release the tax from their super or pay the liability from their own resources outside super.

Super knowledge is a super power

SuperGuide newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

Get super and retirement planning tips and strategies with our free monthly newsletter.

First name*

In a small concession, the interest rate applied to late payments is four percentage points lower than the rate that applies to most other overdue tax payments.

The released explanatory material states that the lower interest rate should be closer to market rates and is intended to avoid penalising people in the “very rare circumstances” that they do not have available funds within or outside super with which to pay the tax liability. This could apply to those who have SMSFs that have most of their assets tied up in illiquid investments such as property.

Exemptions

People who have received a structured settlement contribution, who died before the last day of the income year, or who are child recipients of death benefit pensions are not subject to the Divison 296.

Earnings from constitutionally protected (untaxed) funds for State higher level office holders, along with earnings from the super of sitting Justices of the High Court appointed before 1 July 2025 and earnings from non-complying funds are exempt from tax. The balances of these accounts will however be included when assessing whether the $3 million cap has been reached, so tax can be applied to the earnings of other superannuation interests held by the same individual.

Future indexation

While the law does not mention indexation, it does introduce the term “large superannuation balance threshold” which is used throughout, instead of the figure of $3 million.

If a future government decides the threshold should be indexed or otherwise altered, this can be achieved simply by changing the amount of the “large superannuation balance threshold” defined in law.

The impact on retirees

Retirees can currently transfer up to $2 million (the transfer balance cap) from their accumulation accounts into retirement phase pension accounts. Investment earnings on retirement phase accounts are tax free and this will not change. However, the value of these accounts is included in your TSB and counts towards the $3 million threshold for calculation of Division 296 tax.

Retirees who have a total balance (including retirement phase interests and accumulation phase interests) above $3 million will therefore be affected by Division 296 tax in the same way as anyone else.

Learn more about the transfer balance cap.

The legislation clarifies that a change to the definition of TSB is required that will have it capture the ‘withdrawal value’ of benefits. We will know more about this when regulations are finalised, but it will mean that non-account-based pensions (including defined benefit pensions) will need to be revalued annually.

The change is needed because the value of these pensions for TSB purposes is currently determined only when the pension commences and does not change. This renders the current TSB definition unsuitable for the purposes of Division 296, which requires that the annual change in value of accounts is known, to determine taxable earnings.

As the change in definition will apply across the board, not just to Division 296 tax, it will have broader consequences for other measures that refer to the TSB such as concessional contribution caps and eligibility to use carry-forward concessional contributions.

Boost your super with a SuperGuide membership

Unlock independent expert tips and strategies to make the most of your super and make your retirement goals a reality.
  • Discover best performing super and pension funds
  • Experts detail tips and strategies to boost your nest egg
  • Interactive tools and calculators give you power to plan
  • Step-by-step guides help you put plans into action
  • Comprehensive super rules in plain language
  • Newsletters and webinars keep you on top of the current rules

Find out more


About the author

Related topics,

IMPORTANT: All information on SuperGuide is general in nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether any information on SuperGuide is appropriate to you before acting on it. If SuperGuide refers to a financial product you should obtain the relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) or seek personal financial advice before making any investment decisions. Comments provided by readers that may include information relating to tax, superannuation or other rules cannot be relied upon as advice. SuperGuide does not verify the information provided within comments from readers. Learn more

© Copyright SuperGuide 2008-25. Copyright for this guide belongs to SuperGuide Pty Ltd, and cannot be reproduced without express and specific consent. Learn more

Responses

  1. Des SOARES Avatar
    Des SOARES

    How will this change affect super funds that own property? Does this mean property will need to be valued each year rather than every 2-3 years at present?

    1. Kate Crawford Avatar
      Kate Crawford

      Hi Des, There is no change to valuation practices specifically required by the new tax.
      However, as many SMSFs value property every three years their trustees will need to consider if more frequent valuation would be desirable – perhaps to avoid lumpy tax liabilities. APRA regulated funds (non SMSFs) are required to comply with the Prudential Standard for Investment Governance under which APRA expects funds to revalue assets on at least a quarterly basis.

  2. mac1@possumology.com Avatar
    mac1@possumology.com

    For the moment, disregarding arguments about the fairness or otherwise of increasing the tax for those fortunate/diligent enough to have built a super balance of $5M+ or $3M+, the one thing that nobody seems to be commenting on is the actual mechanism for implementing this – which is not only unfair but, it seems to me, could have profound and unanticipated effects on ASX trading markets at EOFY.

    The government commentary presents this as simply increasing the tax rate from 15% to 30% for the proportion of your super balance over $3M BUT THIS IS NOT WHAT IS ACTUALLY PROPOSED.

    Within the super fund the 15% tax rate applies to the fund’s taxable income (assessable income less ECPI) now, if we took the government top level overview at face value, someone with a super balance of say $6M (ie 50% of their balance is above $3M) might expect 50% of their fund’s taxable income to be taxed at 15% and the other 50% to be taxed at 30%.

    HOWEVER the government, recognising that this would be a nightmare to actually administer if they required the actual Funds to apply this system, has left the actual super tax system unchanged and decided to levy this as an additional tax at the personal level. The real problem is that, to come up with a simple method of calculating the personal fund income to tax, they have decided to tax Fund EARNINGS – which they have defined as the increase in a person’s super BALANCE.

    Yes, this means that you will get taxed not only on capital gains on shares sold but also on UNREALISED capital gains. Given that the annual performance of the ASX can be much greater or less than the average return this will result in a very lumpy tax impost dependant on the 30 June closing prices at the beginning and end of the FY.

    Anyone who invests in shares with low liquidity with will be familiar with the fact that the closing price of these shares can be moved significantly by even small orders at the end of the day. As a long term investor in such a company you regard this as insignificant “noise” overlying the long term performance but, under this new scheme, a member whose fund has a significant holding in such an illiquid company could face a large variation in personal tax if someone buys/sells a quite small position at close of play on 30 June.

    Since often the reason for the low liquidity is retained ownership by the founders – they could have a real problem if their holdings are held in their super and the EOFY closing price changes significantly.

    I could go on and on about the unforseen problems I can see here – but I suspect it is worth an article of it’s own.

Leave a Reply