• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SuperGuide

Superannuation and retirement planning information

  • SuperGuide Premium
  • Account
  • Log In
  • SuperGuide Premium
  • Account
  • Log In
  • How super works
    • Super for beginners
    • Super rules
    • Employers guide to super
    • Super contributions
    • Super and tax
    • Accessing super
    • Super news
    • Women and super
    • Super tips and strategies
    • How-to guides
    • Super quizzes
    • Superannuation Q&As
    • Superannuation glossary
  • Super funds
    • Best performing super funds
    • Super fund rankings
    • Best performing pension funds
    • Pension fund rankings
    • Super fund average returns
    • Super investing strategies
    • Comparing super funds
    • Choosing a super fund
    • Choosing an investment option
    • Super fund fees
    • Insurance and super
    • Super fund profiles
  • SMSFs
    • SMSFs for beginners
    • SMSF administration
    • SMSF checklists
    • SMSF compliance
    • SMSF investing
    • SMSF pensions
    • SMSF strategies
    • SMSF Q&As
  • Plan your retirement
    • Retirement planning for beginners
    • When should I retire?
    • How long will I live?
    • How much super do I need?
    • Will I get the Age Pension?
    • How much will I spend in retirement?
    • Financial advice
    • Retiring overseas
    • Preparing for retirement
    • Retirement planning strategies
    • Retirement calculators and reckoners
  • In retirement
    • Income in retirement
    • Super lump sums
    • Super pensions
    • Age Pension
    • Working in retirement
    • Life in retirement
    • Senior concessions and services
    • Aged care
    • Estate planning
    • Super death benefits

Home / Super funds / Comparing super funds

Superannuation funds: Does size really matter?

June 3, 2019 by Janine Mace 1 Comment

Reading time: 7 minutes


Important: Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The returns that super funds achieve will change over time and readers should continue to monitor their super’s performance.

All information on SuperGuide is general in nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether any information on SuperGuide is appropriate to you before acting on it. If SuperGuide refers to a financial product you should obtain the relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) or seek personal financial advice before making any investment decisions.


When it comes to choosing a superannuation fund, it’s natural to think that big is better.

After all, it’s a handy rule of thumb that works for a lot of things in life and it’s one way to simplify the choice you need to make between dozens of different super funds. But does being big really make a super fund better?

Super funds: Do big funds perform better?

Although many of the big super funds want you to believe they are superior to their smaller siblings, unfortunately the truth is not that straightforward. Like most investments, questions about what asset performs best depends on the time period you are talking about.

To help readers understand this issue a little better, SuperGuide has reviewed some of the data produced by superannuation research firm, SuperRatings. If you look at the table below, it shows the median return of Balanced (60%-76% growth assets) investment options for the large group of super funds tracked by SuperRatings. These are categorised by the size of the asset pool the super fund administers on behalf of its fund members.

The table shows which category of super fund (by asset size) achieved the highest median return for the Balanced investment option in each of five time periods over the past 10 years stretching up to 31 March 2019.

The results highlight that for the Balanced investment option:

Are you with a top performing super fund?

Click here to compare more than 90 Australian super funds, including returns, fees, features, awards and more.
  • Over a 1-year period, the highest median return was achieved by super funds with under $5 billion in assets (7.2%).
  • Over a 3-year period, the highest median return was achieved by super funds with between $10 billion and $20 billion in assets (8.8%).
  • Over a 5-year period, the highest median return was achieved by super funds with between $10 billion and $20 billion in assets (7.7%).
  • Over a 7-year period, the highest median return was achieved by super funds with between $10 billion and $20 billion in assets (8.7%).
  • Over a 10-year period, the highest median return was achieved by super funds with between $20 billion and $50 billion in assets (8.9%).

Median returns by total fund size as at 31 March 2019

Fund size Option type 1 yr 3 yr 5 yr 7 yr 10 yr
<$5bn Balanced (60-76) 7.2% 7.9% 7.1% 8.5% 8.4%
$5-10bn Balanced (60-76) 6.7% 8.4% 7.0% 8.1% 8.3%
$10-20bn Balanced (60-76) 7.0% 8.8% 7.7% 8.7% 8.9%
$20-50bn Balanced (60-76) 7.0% 8.0% 7.1% 8.3% 8.9%
$50bn + Balanced (60-76) 7.0% 8.1% 7.1% 8.5% 8.9%

Source: SuperRatings

Note: Returns are net of investment fees, tax and implicit asset-based administration fees. Fund Net Assets are as at 30 June 2018. Investment Returns are as at 31 March 2019.

Great, but what does it mean?

Although all these numbers can seem a bit nerdy, the main message from the SuperRatings research is in most cases there is no clear relationship between super fund size and investment performance.

When you look over the performance of a large group of super funds at different times over a 10-year period, the size category of funds achieving the highest median return varied. There was no clear pattern of a certain size fund performing best.

Interestingly, the difference between the highest and the lowest median returns by different sized funds was not particularly large – except over the 3-year time period, where the highest return was 8.8% and the lowest 7.9%.

Over the 10-year period, the median returns clustered more closely together, with the highest being 8.9% and the lowest 8.3%. Even then, some small super funds (with assets under $5 billion) performed well to give a median return of 8.4%, compared with the category covering the largest super funds ($50 billion plus), whose median return was 8.9%.

Compare super funds

Read more...

Advertisement

This again reinforces the idea that there is only a weak relationship between the size of a super fund and how well it will perform when it comes to the investment return achieved by its Balanced investment option.

What about the biggest funds?

So if holding lots of assets on behalf of fund members doesn’t necessarily mean a super fund performs any better than a super fund with fewer assets, what happens when you look at the performance of the biggest funds?

Well, SuperRatings took a look at the 20 largest super funds in Australia over a 10-year time period to see what happened and whether the largest of these big super funds outperformed their slightly smaller – but still pretty large – rival super funds.

Largest 20 super funds (Balanced investment options) – Performance and ranking over 5 years and 10 years to 31 March 2019

Size Rank Fund Name Option Name Fund Asset Size ($bn)  10-year return (%pa)  10-year rank  5-year return (%pa)  5-year rank
1 AustralianSuper AustralianSuper – Balanced $50bn + 9.3 12 9.0 2
2 QSuper QSuper – Balanced $50bn + 9.5 9 8.6 7
3 MLC Super Fund MLC MKey – Horizon 4 – Balanced Portfolio $50bn + 8.9 36 7.5 42
4 Colonial First State FirstChoice Superannuation Trust CFS-FC Wsale Pers – FirstChoice Wsale Moderate $50bn + 8.3 67 6.0 111
5 First State Superannuation Scheme First State Super – Growth $50bn + 8.9 39 7.9 27
6 UniSuper Fund UniSuper Accum (1) – Balanced $50bn + 9.6 6 8.8 3
7 Retirement Wrap BT Lifetime Super Emp – BT Multi-manager Balanced $50bn + 7.8 81 5.5 115
8 AMP Superannuation Savings Trust AMP FLS – AMP Balanced Growth $50bn + 7.4 89 6.1 103
9 Sunsuper Superannuation Fund Sunsuper for Life – Balanced $50bn + 9.1 25 8.5 10
10 Retail Employees Superannuation Trust Rest – Core Strategy $50bn + 9.1 20 7.1 65
11 HESTA Super Fund HESTA – Core Pool $20-50bn 9.0 27 8.0 23
12 Construction and Building Industry Super (Cbus) Cbus – Growth (Cbus MySuper) $20-50bn 9.2 16 8.8 4
13 OnePath MasterFund OnePath Integra – OptiMix Balanced $20-50bn 6.7 96 5.1 123
14 Hostplus Superannuation Fund Hostplus – Balanced $20-50bn 9.3 15 9.3 1
15 Government Employees Superannuation Board (GESB) GESB Super – My GESB Super Plan $20-50bn 9.0 31 6.8 81
16 Emergency Services Superannuation Scheme ESSSuper Accum – Growth $20-50bn 8.5 53 6.8 84
17 IOOF Portfolio Service Superannuation Fund IOOF Employer Super Core – IOOF MultiMix Balanced Growth Trust $20-50bn – – 6.9 76
18 Mercer Super Trust Mercer Super Trust – Mercer Growth $20-50bn 8.5 56 7.2 58
19 Asgard Super and Pension Account ASGARD Emp Super – SMA Balanced $20-50bn – – 6.8 85
20 VicSuper Fund VicSuper FutureSaver – Balanced Option $20-50bn 8.4 63 7.4 49
    Sample size of funds     98   124

Source: SuperRatings

Note: Returns are net of investment fees, tax and implicit asset-based administration fees. Fund net assets are as at 30 June 2018. Investment returns are as at 31 March 2019.

Looking at the 10-year and 5-year median investment returns for the Balanced investment option of 20 of the largest super funds in Australia, the investment returns again failed to show that being the biggest in terms of the amount of assets you manage doesn’t mean you will necessarily achieve the highest returns.

Advertisement

In fact, some of the largest super funds achieved some pretty ordinary returns.

Over the 5-year period, the fourth largest super fund in terms of assets, the performance of Colonial First State’s FirstChoice Superannuation Trust saw it ranked at 111, while over the 10-year period it only managed to be ranked at 67.

Ranked at number seven in terms of assets, the performance of Retirement Wrap (BT’s Lifetime Super Employer – BT Multi-manager Balanced) was also a disappointing 115 over the 5-year period and 81 (out of 98 super funds) over the 10-year period. Both Colonial First State and BT Retirement Wrap are retail super funds

These results seem to indicate that again, being bigger in terms of asset size is no guarantee of top performance for a Balanced investment option over the longer term.

For more about the latest super fund performance, see SuperGuide articles:

  • Super fund performance: Latest monthly returns
  • Super fund performance: Latest annual returns

So what’s going on?

Why wouldn’t bigger super funds have an advantage over their smaller rivals?


Advertisement

This is an issue the Productivity Commission (PC) gave some thought to during its recent inquiry into the performance of the super industry in Australia and its subsequent lengthy report, Superannuation: Assessing Efficiency and Competitiveness.

The PC report pointed out that picking a super fund with a strong (although not necessarily top) investment performance was important to the amount a member receives in retirement. It found a typical full-time worker whose super fund was in the bottom 25% of super funds when it came to investment performance over their lifetime, would retire with a final balance 54% (or $660,000) lower than if they are in a super fund with investment returns in the top 25% of funds.

The PC also highlighted the importance of being in a super fund that is large enough to benefit from the so-called ‘economies of scale’ that come with more assets. These include things like making administration costs cheaper by spreading them across more members, or the reduced cost of investing that goes with a bigger asset base.

For this reason – rather than better investment returns – the PC believes smaller super funds should be encouraged to merge. “Size is not the sole determinant of performance, but both underperformance and evidence of clear economies of scale point to scope for more fund mergers in the interest of members,” the report noted.

Does fund type matter?

Another point highlighted by the PC report was that not all types of super funds have the same return performance as they get bigger, which is reflected in the SuperRatings research data.

The report echoed the SuperRatings data when it noted: “Net returns are positively related to size for not-for-profit funds. No corresponding correlation was found for for-profit fund”.

Translated, this means fund size has a stronger relationship with good investment performance for not-for-profit super funds (like industry funds) than it does for for-profit funds (like retail super funds).

So it might be sensible to also consider the type of super fund you select for your retirement savings, not just how big it is.

For more information, see SuperGuide article What are the different types of super funds?

Super tip

Regularly checking the investment performance of your super fund helps you stay in control of your retirement savings.

A sensible benchmark to measure your fund’s performance against is the median investment return for super funds over 5-year and 10-year periods.

Always ensure you are comparing the median investment return for your selected investment option (e.g. Balanced or High Growth).

Fund size and your super: What are the lessons for members?

The research by both the PC and SuperRatings highlights some important points super fund members can consider if they want to achieve strong investment returns for their retirement savings.

But trying to pick the best performing super fund every year is impossible. As ASIC’s MoneySmart website notes: “No-one can reliably predict which fund will perform the best. It’s far better to pick the right investment strategy and the fund with lower fees, and take the ups and downs of investment performance in your stride.”

To help you choose the right fund, here’s some points to consider:

1. Returns change from year to year

A super fund’s investment performance varies from year to year, so some years the performance will be lower than others.

2. Aim for reasonable, rather than stellar performance

Nobody can pick next year’s top performing super fund.

3. Check the fund’s performance over 5-year and 10-year periods

You will be saving for your retirement over many years, so looking at the performance results from short periods like 1-year or 3-year won’t tell you much.

4. Check you are comparing similar types of funds

As the PC report noted, size is more closely related to investment performance when it comes to not-for-profit super funds than for-profit super funds.

5. Ensure you compare the same investment option

Check you are comparing the same type of investments. The investment return for a cash investment option can’t be compared with a Balanced investment option as they hold very different investment assets and tells you little about how well your fund is performing.

For more information about selecting a super fund, see SuperGuide article How to compare super funds in 7 easy steps.

Are you with a top performing super fund?

Click here to compare more than 90 Australian super funds, including returns, fees, features, awards and more.

Learn more about super fund performance in the following SuperGuide articles:

Monthly super fund performance Reckoner: Monthly returns for 5 investment categories

January 19, 2021

Super fund performance over 28 calendar years (to December 2020)

January 19, 2021

Annual super fund performance Reckoner: Annual returns for 5 investment categories

January 19, 2021

Super fund performance: Monthly returns to December 2020

January 19, 2021

What are lifecycle super funds, and how do they perform?

September 16, 2020

Pension fund performance to September 2020

August 7, 2020

Fund Performance: SMSFs vs APRA super funds

May 7, 2019

Learn more about the best performing super funds in the following SuperGuide articles:

Best performing super funds: Growth category (61–80%)

January 19, 2021

Super funds of the year awards: Best super funds for 2020/21

December 9, 2020

Top 10 Balanced super funds ranked by risk and return

August 4, 2020

Best performing super funds: All Growth category (96–100%)

August 4, 2020

Best performing super funds: High Growth category (81–95%)

August 4, 2020

Best performing super funds: Balanced category (41–60%)

August 4, 2020

Best performing super funds: Conservative category (21–40%)

August 4, 2020

Top performing sustainable investment funds

April 12, 2019

Related topics

Comparing super funds Super funds

IMPORTANT: All information on SuperGuide is general in nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether any information on SuperGuide is appropriate to you before acting on it. If SuperGuide refers to a financial product you should obtain the relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) or seek personal financial advice before making any investment decisions. Comments provided by readers that may include information relating to tax, superannuation or other rules cannot be relied upon as advice. SuperGuide does not verify the information provided within comments from readers. Learn more

© Copyright SuperGuide 2009-21. Copyright for this article belongs to SuperGuide Pty Ltd, and cannot be reproduced without express and specific consent. Learn more

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. John says

    June 23, 2019 at 2:30 pm

    Comparing investment profiles can be fraught too. One fund’s asset spread for it’s ‘mysuper/balanced’ profile can be very different to another fund’s asset spread for the same profile. I’ve noticed these differences are amplified when one compares the more conservative profiles. One fund’s 15% in infrastructure can be another fund’s 0%. Admin/investment fees also vary (quite a bit!) in these other profiles.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

How super works
Super for beginners
Super rules
Employers guide to super
Super contributions
Super and tax
Accessing super
Super news
Women and super
Super tips and strategies
How-to guides
Super quizzes
Superannuation Q&As
Superannuation glossary
Super funds
Best performing super funds
Super fund rankings
Best performing pension funds
Pension fund rankings
Super fund average returns
Super investing strategies
Comparing super funds
Choosing a super fund
Choosing an investment option
Super fund fees
Insurance and super
Super fund profiles
SMSFs
SMSFs for beginners
SMSF administration
SMSF checklists
SMSF compliance
SMSF investing
SMSF pensions
SMSF strategies
SMSF Q&As
Plan your retirement
Retirement planning for beginners
When should I retire?
How long will I live?
How much super do I need?
Will I get the Age Pension?
How much will I spend in retirement?
Financial advice
Retiring overseas
Preparing for retirement
Retirement planning strategies
Retirement calculators and reckoners
In retirement
Income in retirement
Super lump sums
Super pensions
Age Pension
Working in retirement
Life in retirement
Senior concessions and services
Aged care
Estate planning
Super death benefits
Advertisement
Compare super funds

Join SuperGuide Premium and give your retirement plans a boost.

Get access to independent expert commentary on the latest super, retirement and SMSF issues, including the top performing super and pension funds, how much super is enough, the latest super rates and thresholds and new super measures and strategies.

You’ll have access to more than 500 articles, how-to super guides, checklists, tips, calculators, reckoners and other tools, as well as a monthly newsletter.

Find out more

Footer

Important: Disclaimer

All information on SuperGuide is general in nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs.

You should consider whether any information on SuperGuide is appropriate to you before acting on it.

If SuperGuide refers to a financial product you should obtain the relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) or seek personal financial advice before making any investment decisions.

Learn more

About SuperGuide

SuperGuide is Australia’s leading superannuation and retirement planning website. Learn more

Superguide Pty Ltd ATF Superguide Unit Trust as a Corporate Authorised Representative (CAR) is a Corporate Authorised Representative of Independent Financial Advisers Australia, AFSL 464629

  • Contact us
  • Advertise on SuperGuide
  • Careers

Before using this website

  • New to SuperGuide?
  • Terms and Conditions of Use
  • Financial Services Guide
  • Privacy Policy and Privacy Collection
  • Copyright Policy
  • Editorial Policy and Complaints
  • Disclaimer

  • SuperGuide Premium
  • Subscriber feedback
  • Sitemap