SuperGuide

Simple superannuation and retirement planning information

Age Pension: 300,000 Australians lost entitlements on 1 January 2017

by 281 Comments

Note: In this article you can learn about the radical change to the Age Pension assets test thresholds, which took effect on 1 January 2017. For disturbing analysis of how these changes affect middle Australia, see our Retirementgate series (Retirementgate: Government’s Age Pension debacle hits middle Australia), and for the latest assets test thresholds, see SuperGuide article Age Pension: Assets test thresholds applicable from July 2018.

On 1 January 2017, more than 330,000 Age Pensioners had their Age Pension entitlements cut, with at least 100,000 of those affected Australians losing all Age Pension entitlements.


The Age Pension cuts were caused by the stricter Age Pension assets test that took effect from 1 January 2017. The taper rate for the assets test, which determines how much Age Pension you receive, now reduces your Age Pension entitlement by $3 a fortnight for every $1000 of assets you own over the full Age Pension threshold. Until 31 December 2016, the taper rate was $1.50 per $1000 of assets over the full Age Pension threshold. I explain how this harsher taper rate affects Age Pensioners later in the article (or see SuperGuide article Retirementgate: Government’s Age Pension debacle hits middle Australia).

Note: The Age Pension assets test thresholds listed in the article were current as at 1 January 2017 (at the time of the introduction of the harsher assets test) through to June 2017 (for FULL Age Pension thresholds) and through to March 2017 (for PART Age Pension thresholds), and are mentioned for historical reference and illustration. For the latest Age Pension assets test thresholds, see SuperGuide article Age Pension: Assets test thresholds applicable from July 2018.

Background: Changes to the Age Pension assets test are now law, and took effect from 1 January 2017. The successful passage through parliament was due to the Greens supporting the changes announced by the Coalition government in the 2015 federal budget. Although the ALP opposed the changes when the laws went through parliament, the ALP has stated it will not reverse these changes, due to budgetary constraints. Since 1 January 2017 however, the ALP has publicly stated it may review the Age Pension changes.

Couples and single people were hit by the harsher Age Pension assets test, which tool effect on 1 January 2017.

Couples: Age Pension changes on 1 January 2017

When the Age Pension assets test changes were first announced, we were told by the federal government, that, as a couple, if you received the Age Pension, and you owned more than $823,000 in assets including super and all other assets (but excluding your home), then you would no longer receive the Age Pension from 1 January 2017. For those Age Pensioner home-owning couples who owned less than $823,000 in assets, but more than $450,000 in assets, then you were also warned to expect your Age Pension entitlements to be hit. All of this proved to be the case, but on 1 January 2017, the harsher Age Pension assets test for a couple actually cut out at a lower amount – $816,000!

Oops! The federal government had based the earlier information on projected Age Pension rates as at 1 January 2017, and Age Pension rates were actually lower than anticipated. What this boo-boo meant is that the cut-off point, as at 1 January 2017, for a PART Age Pension was even lower than $823,000 for a couple. According to Centrelink (DHS), the cut-off point was $816,000 for a home-owning couple. My estimate is that many more thousands of Australians than predicted received a Centrelink letter during December 2016, and a financial shock since 1 January 2017. Until 31 December 2016, a home-owning couple could have up to $1,178,500 in assets before they lost the Age Pension. You can find more details on the specifics, including tables for couples, later in the article, or if you are simply seeking the latest assets test thresholds, then see SuperGuide article Age Pension: Assets test thresholds applicable from July 2018.

Note: Higher assets test thresholds apply for Age Pensioner couples (and singles) who don’t own their own home (for more information, see article link immediately above, see the table in the next section, and tables at the end of the article).

Single people: Age Pension changes since 1 January 2017

Likewise, we were told by the federal government, that as a single person, if you received the Age Pension, and you owned more than $547,000 in assets including super and all other assets (but excluding your home), then you lost your Age Pension entitlements from 1 January 2017. For those Age Pensioner home-owning single people who owned less than $547,000 in assets but more than $250,000 in assets, then you were also warned to expect your Age Pension entitlements to be hit.  All of this proved to be the case, but on 1 January 2017, the harsher Age Pension assets test for a single person actually cut out at a lower amount – $542,500!

Another oops! The federal government had again based this information on projected Age Pension rates as at 1 January 2017, and Age Pension rates were actually lower than anticipated. What this boo-boo meant is that the cut-off point for a PART Age Pension for a single person was even lower than $547,000. According to Centrelink (DHS), since 1 January 2017, the cut-off point was $542,500 for a home-owning single person.

Until 31 December 2016, a home-owning single person could have up to $793,750 in assets before they lost the Age Pension. You can find more details on the specifics, including tables for single people, later in the article, or if you are simply seeking the latest assets test thresholds, then see SuperGuide article Age Pension: Assets test thresholds applicable from July 2018.

Note: Higher assets test thresholds apply for single Age Pensioners (and couples) who don’t own their own home (for more information, see article link immediately above, table below and tables at the end of the article).

Some good news for FULL Age Pensioners, and bad news for other Centrelink recipients

Important: On a positive note, the assets test thresholds for claiming the FULL Age Pension increased on 1 January 2017, which meant an estimated 50,000 extra Australians were eligible for the FULL Age Pension. On the downside, the harsher Age Pension assets test for PART Age Pension meant an estimated 330,000 Australians lost Age Pension entitlements, with 100,000 of those retirees losing all entitlements.  Since the PART Age Pension assets test thresholds were lower than first announced, we expect these estimates for Australians losing Age Pension entitlements to be conservative.

According to the federal government, on 1 January 2017, an additional 50,000 lucky Australians received the FULL Age Pension (rather than their previous PART Age Pension entitlement) due to an increase in the assets-test free area threshold, which took effect from 1 January 2017. The assets-test free threshold is the measure for the FULL Age Pension, that is, when your assets, excluding the family home, are valued lower than the threshold. You are then entitled to the FULL Age Pension, assuming you also meet the Age Pension income test (see SuperGuide article Australian Age Pension: Am I eligible and how do I apply?).

On 1 January 2017, the assets-test free threshold increased from the previous $209,000 for a single person (home-owner) to $250,000, and for a home-owning couple, increased from $296,500 to $375,000.

For non-homeowners, since 1 January 2017, the threshold increased from $360,500 to $450,000 for a single person, and increased from $448,000 to $575,000 for a couple who don’t own their own home. See Table 1 below for the list of thresholds (as at 1 January 2017) to ensure FULL Age Pension eligibility, and for the latest Age Pension assets test thresholds see SuperGuide article Age Pension: Assets test thresholds applicable from July 2018.

Warning: The harsher assets test also applies to other social security pensions, including disability support pension, wife pension, carer payment, bereavement allowance, widow B pension and certain pensions administered by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs. According to the revised Explanatory Memorandum accompanying the legislation, the assets test also applies to parenting payment and allowances (widow allowance, youth allowance, austudy payment, newstart allowance, sickness allowance, special benefit and partner allowance).

What were the Age Pension assets test thresholds from 1 January 2017?

In the tables below, we outline the FULL Age Pension assets thresholds (Table A) (from January 2017 until June 2017). In Table B, we outline the PART Age Pension assets thresholds (from January 2017 until March 2017). Table A includes the previous Age Pension assets test thresholds (from 20 September 2016 until 31 December 2016), and what the federal government said the UPPER asset thresholds (for PART Age Pension eligibility) would be as at 1 January 2017, and what the UPPER asset thresholds actually were, as at 1 January 2017.

Table A: Age Pension LOWER assets test thresholds (for FULL Age Pension) – Age Pension assets-test free area

  Homeowner Non-homeowner
  Until Dec 2016* Jan 2017 to June 2017 Until Dec 2016* Jan 2017 to June 2017
Single $209,000 $250,000 $360,500 $450,000
Couple $296,500 $375,000 $448,000 $575,000

Source: Updated and adapted by Trish Power, but the earlier version was adapted from, Revised explanatory memorandum, Social Services Legislation Amendment (Fair and Sustainable Pensions) Act 2015. For the latest Age Pension assets test thresholds, see SuperGuide article Age Pension: Assets test thresholds applicable from July 2018.

In Table B below, we outline what the Age Pension assets test thresholds were (from 20 September 2016 until 31 December 2016), and what the federal government said the UPPER asset thresholds (for PART Age Pension eligibility) would be as at 1 January 2017, and what the PART Age Pension thresholds actually are, as at 1 January 2017.

Table B: Age Pension UPPER assets test thresholds (for PART Age Pension)

  Home owner Non-homeowner
    Announced ACTUAL   Announced ACTUAL
  Until 31 Dec 2016 for 1 Jan 2017 to March 2017 for 1 Jan 2017 to June 2017 Until 31 Dec 2016 for 1 Jan 2017 to June 2017 for 1 Jan 2017 to June 2017
Single $793,750 $547,000 $542,500 $945,250 $747,000 $742,500
Couple $1,178,500 $823,000 $816,000 $1,330,000 $1,023,000 $1,016,000

How does the harsher Age Pension assets test work?

The stricter Age Pension assets test operates as follows: The taper rate for the assets test, which determines how much Age Pension you receive, reduces your Age Pension entitlement by $3 a fortnight for every $1000 of assets you own over the full Age Pension threshold, which took effect from 1 January 2017. Until 31 December 2016, the taper rate was $1.50 per $1000 of assets over the full Age Pension threshold. I explain how this harsher taper rate affects Age Pensioners later in the article.

Based on comments from readers, there appears to be some serious structural flaws in this change to the Age Pension assets test. For many Australians there is an incentive to restructure or sell down assets to ensure they don’t end up on a lower income than those receiving a FULL or PART Age Pension. For the latest sample of observations and reactions from SuperGuide readers see Age Pension January 2017 changes: Latest comments from readers.

Tip: For detailed analysis of the financial impact (and disincentives to save for retirement) of the radical change to the Age Pension assets test, see SuperGuide article Retirementgate: Government’s Age Pension debacle hits middle Australia.

More than 330,000 retired Australians lost some or all Age Pension entitlements overnight on 1 January 2017, while around 50,000 retired Australians become eligible overnight for a FULL Age Pension on 1 January 2017 (when before 1 January 2017 they were receiving a PART Age Pension). The Age Pension assets changes are:

  • Harsher taper rate for PART Age Pension entitlements: The taper rate for the assets test, which determines how much Age Pension you receive, reduces your Age Pension entitlement by $3 a fortnight for every $1000 of assets you own over the FULL Age Pension threshold, which took effect from 1 January 2017. Until 31 December 2016, the taper rate was $1.50 per $1000 of assets over the FULL Age Pension threshold. In effect, the PART Age Pension threshold was cut by $362,500 on previous threshold levels for home-owning couples and cut by $251,250 for single home-owners, which is why more than 330,000 retirees lost entitlements from 1 January 2017, either partially, or fully. See tables later in the article, for how the harsher assets test hits retirees.
  • Higher threshold for FULL Age Pension: On 1 January 2017, the assets-test free threshold increased from $209,000 for a single person who is a home-owner to $250,000, and for a home-owning couple, increased from $296,500 to $375,000. The expansion of the lower threshold meant 50,000 more Australians were entitled to a FULL Age Pension, who previously received a PART Age Pension, and the government estimated that increasing the threshold for FULL Age Pension entitlement, benefited 170,000 retired Australians. The assets-test free threshold is the measure for the FULL Age Pension, that is, when your assets, excluding the family home, are valued lower than the threshold, and you are then entitled to the FULL Age Pension, assuming you also meet the Age Pension income test.

In anyone’s language this is a retrospective change to the Age Pension rules and hits retirees receiving a PART Age Pension. In most cases, these retirees are not in position to return to work to replace the income they have lost since 1 January 2017, and the Coalition government, with the support of the Greens, has essentially devastated the retirement plans of several hundred thousand Australian retirees. Although the ALP’s position is not much better, with Opposition leader Bill Shorten publicly stating that the ALP will not reverse the changes with the help of the independents, even though the ALP opposed the passage of the legislation when it became law (although since 1 January 2017, the ALP has made noises about reviewing the Age Pension changes). For disturbing analysis of the financial impact of these changes, see SuperGuide article Retirementgate: Government’s Age Pension debacle hits middle Australia.

Background: On 7 May 2015 the federal government announced changes to the Age Pension assets test (and confirmed this policy in the May 2015 Federal Budget), affecting those retirees receiving a PART Age Pension. According to the then Minister for Social Services, Scott Morrison, around 326,000 retired Australians will lose some or all of their Age Pension entitlements due to a new, harsher Age Pension assets test. The announced changes are now law.

Lost all Age Pension on 1 January 2017: then automatically received CSHC

According to the revised Explanatory Memorandum accompanying the legislation introducing the Age Pension assets test changes, “Those whose pension is cancelled will automatically be issued with a Commonwealth Seniors Health Card, or a Health Care Card for those under pension age [and receiving a different Centrelink benefit], without the need to meet the usual income requirements. Veterans whose service pension is cancelled under this measure will retain their Veterans’ Affairs Gold Card.”

For more information on the CSHC and relationship with the change to the Age Pension assets test, see SuperGuide article Done deal! Lost Age Pension, got new Seniors Health Card, and for more information about the CSHC generally, see SuperGuide article Are you eligible for a Commonwealth Seniors Health Card?

Note: The Age Pension federal government legislation does not deal with state-based concessions, such as rate and utility discounts. You will need to check with your council and service providers, since these concessions are provided by the states, and to assist you with this endeavour, SuperGuide has prepared a comprehensive summary of state-based concessions for older Australians (see SuperGuide article Concession cards: Am I eligible and what entitlements can I expect?).

Note January 2016 Age Pension changes affect defined benefit pensions

On 1 January 2016, the government changed the Age Pension income test rules for retired public servants, and other retirees (typically retired employees of some large companies) receiving defined benefit superannuation pensions: Taking effect since 1 January 2016, this measure affects 35% of retired public servants, and an unknown number of retirees (estimated to be 2,450 retirees) receiving defined benefit pensions from company super funds. For more information on this change to the Age Pension income test see SuperGuide article Age Pension income test change hits funded defined benefit pensions.

How do the Age Pension rules work generally?

The Age Pension assets test (also known as the Centrelink assets test) is a means test that assesses the value of the assets you own against asset thresholds, and determines your eligibility for the Age Pension and other social security payments.

An eligible individual must satisfy the Age Pension income test, and the Age Pension assets test to receive a FULL, or PART, Age Pension. The amount of Age Pension will be based on the test that delivers the lowest amount of Age Pension entitlement. If an individual fails one of the tests, then he or she will not be eligible for the Age Pension. For more information on Age Pension eligibility, see SuperGuide articles Australian Age Pension: 10 important facts you should know and Australian Age Pension: Am I eligible and how do I apply?

Continue reading this article for more detailed information on the Age Pension assets test changes which took effect on 1 January 2017 (including comprehensive tables).

If you are seeking general information on the Age Pension changes, and also information on the broader Age Pension rules (including latest rates and thresholds), see the following SuperGuide articles:

For those interested in nitty-gritty statistics on the impact of the Age Pension changes…

WARNING: The tables set out below are based on the original announcement from the federal government, that is, that the government estimated the PART Age Pension thresholds to cut out at $547,000 (single homeowner), $823,000 (couple homeowner), $747,000 (single non-homeowner) and $1,023,000 (couple non-homeowner). We have retained the tables in this article more for illustrative purposes and we would have update the tables if the federal government decided to updated tables (as at 18 January 2018 – one year later), no updated tables had been provided.

For guidance on how the stricter tapering rate for the Age Pension assets test  affect single or couple Age Pensioners, and Age Pensioners who own their home, and those that do not, see the 4 tables set out below:

Table 1: Age Pension assets test changes: Home-owner couples

The table below:

  • compares the amount of Age Pension received by a homeowner couple under the measure to “Rebalance the Assets Test Parameters” with the amount they would receive under the [previous]] assets test arrangements;
  • shows the percentage of their assets that they would need to draw down to replace the reduction in their pension as a result of the Rebalance the Assets Test Parameters measure; and
  • shows the number of pensioners with assessable assets in the ranges that are affected by “Rebalance the Assets Parameter” measure.
Assessable Assets Age Pension received at current $1.50 taper rate* Age Pension under rebalanced asset test measure* Reduction (increase) in pension income received % of assets required to replace Age Pension Assessable asset range Number of pensioners with assessable assets in specified range
$100,000 $34,923 $34,923 $0 N/A $0 – $99,999 523,361
$200,000 $34,923 $34,923 $0 N/A $100,000 – $199,999 291,978
$300,000 $34,865 $34,923 ($59) N/A $200,000 – $299,999 197,580
$400,000 $30,965 $32,973 ($2,009) N/A $300,000 – $399,999 116,281
$451,500 $28,956 $28,956 $0 N/A $400,000 – $499,999 81,637
$500,000 $27,065 $25,173 $1,892 0.38%
$600,000 $23,165 $17,373 $5,792 0.97% $500,000 – $599,999 59,992
$700,000 $19,265 $9,573 $9,692 1.38% $600,000 – $699,999 46,640
$800,000 $15,365 $1,773 $13,592 1.70% $700,000 – $799,999 36,528
$823,000 $14,467 $0 $14,467 1.76%
$900,000 $11,465 $0 $11,465 1.27% $800,000 – $899,999 28,358
$1,000,000 $7,565 $0 $7,565 0.76% $900,000 – $999,999 21,865
$1,100,000 $3,665 $0 $3,665 0.33% $1,000,000 – $1,099,999 13,401
$1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 N/A $1,100,000 AND GREATER 2,830

*based on projected pension rates at 1 January 2017. Note that the Age Pension assets threshold for a home-owning couple was cut out at $816,000 rather than $836,000 as illustrated in table.

Table source: Commonwealth of Australia

Table 2: Age Pension assets test changes: Single home-owner

The table below:

  • compares the amount of Age Pension received by a single homeowner under the measure to “Rebalance the Assets Test Parameters” with the amount they would receive under the [previous] assets test arrangements;
  • shows the percentage of their assets that they would need to draw down to replace the reduction in their pension as a result of the Rebalance the Assets Test Parameters measure; and
  • shows the number of pensioners with assessable assets in the ranges that are affected by “Rebalance the Assets Parameter” measure.
Assessable Assets Age Pension received at current $1.50 taper rate* Age Pension under rebalanced asset test measure * Reduction (increase) in pension income received % of assets required to replace Age Pension a year Assessable asset range Number of pensioners with assessable assets in specified range
$100,000 $23,166 $23,166 $0 N/A $0 – $99,999 457,298
$200,000 $23,166 $23,166 $0 N/A $100,000 -$199,999 142,763
$250,000 $21,626 $23,166 ($1,540) N/A $200,000 – $299,999 64,588
$289,500 $20,085 $20,085 $0 N/A
$300,000 $19,676 $19,266 $410 0.14% $300,000 – $399,999 36,732
$400,000 $15,776 $11,466 $4,310 1.08% $400,000 – $499,999 23,517
$500,000 $11,876 $3,666 $8,210 1.64% $500,000 – $599,999 15,463
$547,000 $10,042 $0 $10,042 1.84%
$600,000 $7,976 $0 $7,976 1.33% $600,000 – $699,999 9,731
$700,000 $4,076 $0 $4,076 0.58% $700,000 – $799,999 3,403
$800,000 $176 $0 $176 N/A $800,000 – $899,999 3

*based on projected pension rates at 1 January 2017. Note that the Age Pension assets threshold for a single home-owner was cut out at $542,500 rather than $547,000 as illustrated in table.

Table source: Commonwealth of Australia

Table 3: Age Pension assets test changes: Non-home-owner couple

The table below:

  • compares the amount of Age Pension received by a non-home owner couple under the measure to “Rebalance the Assets Test Parameters” with the amount they would receive under the [previous] assets test arrangements;
  • shows the percentage of their assets that they would need to draw down to replace the reduction in their pension as a result of the Rebalance the Assets Test Parameters measure; and
  • shows the number of pensioners with assessable assets in the ranges that are affected by “Rebalance the Assets Parameter” measure.
Assessable Assets Age Pension received at current $1.50 taper rate* Age Pension under rebalanced asset test measure * Reduction (increase) in pension income received % of assets required to replace Age Pension a year Assessable asset range Number of pensioners with assessable assets in specified range
$100,000 $34,923 $34,923 $0 N/A $0 – $99,999 271,935
$200,000 $34,923 $34,923 $0 N/A $100,000 – $199,999 30,453
$300,000 $34,923 $34,923 $0 N/A $200,000 – $299,999 13,909
$400,000 $34,923 $34,923 $0 N/A $300,000 – $399,999 7,378
$500,000 $33,012 $34,923 ($1,911) N/A $400,000 – $499,999 3,865
$600,000 $29,112 $32,973 ($3,861) N/A $500,000 – $599,999 2,271
$699,000 $25,251 $25,251 $0 N/A $600,000 – $699,999 1,307
$700,000 $25,212 $25,173 $39 0.01%
$800,000 $21,312 $17,373 $3,939 0.49% $700,000 – $799,999 961
$900,000 $17,412 $9,573 $7,839 0.87% $800,000 – $899,999 699
$1,000,000 $13,512 $1,773 $11,739 1.17% $900,000 – $999,999 531
$1,023,000 $12,615 $0 $12,615 1.23% $1,000,000 – $1,099,999 302
$1,100,000 $9,612 $0 $9,612 0.87%
$1,200,000 $5,712 $0 $5,712 0.48% $1,100,000 – $1,199,999 224
$1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 N/A $1,200,000 AND GREATER 102

*based on projected pension rates at 1 January 2017. Note that the Age Pension assets threshold for a non-home-owner couple was cut out at $1,016,000 rather than $1,023,000 as illustrated in table.

Table source: Commonwealth of Australia

Table 4: Age Pension assets test changes: Single non-home owner

The table below:

  • compares the amount of Age Pension received by a single non-home owner under the measure to “Rebalance the Assets Test Parameters” with the amount they would receive under the [previous] assets test arrangements;
  • shows the percentage of their assets that they would need to draw down to replace the reduction in their pension as a result of the Rebalance the Assets Test Parameters measure; and
  • shows the number of pensioners with assessable assets in the ranges that are affected by “Rebalance the Assets Parameter” measure.
Assessable Assets Age Pension received at current $1.50 taper rate* Age Pension under rebalanced asset test measure * Reduction (increase) in pension income received % of assets required to replace Age Pension a year Assessable asset range Number of pensioners with assessable assets in specified range
$100,000 $23,166 $23,166 $0 N/A $0 – $99,999 900,730
$200,000 $23,166 $23,166 $0 N/A $100,000 – $199,999 57,964
$300,000 $23,166 $23,166 $0 N/A $200,000 – $299,999 24,615
$400,000 $21,723 $23,166 ($1,443) N/A $300,000 – $399,999 12,668
$500,000 $17,823 $19,266 ($1,443) N/A $400,000 – $499,999 6,383
$537,000 $16,380 $16,380 $0 N/A $500,000 – $599,999 3,731
$600,000 $13,923 $11,466 $2,457 0.41%
$700,000 $10,023 $3,666 $6,357 0.91% $600,000 – $699,999 2,174
$747,000 $8,190 $0 $8,190 1.1% $700,000 – $799,999 1,292
$800,000 $6,123 $0 $6,123 0.77%
$900,000 $2,223 $0 $2,223 0.25% $800,000 – $899,999 666
$1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 N/A $900,000 – $999,999 67

* based on projected pension rates at 1 January 2017. Note that the Age Pension assets threshold for a single non-home-owner was cut out at $742,500 rather than $747,000 as illustrated in table.

Table source: Commonwealth of Australia

Related articles

Related sections

How super works Planning for retirement SMSFs (Self-managed super funds) Super for Beginners

Related topics

IMPORTANT: SuperGuide does not provide financial advice. All information on SuperGuide.com.au is intended only as a guide. It is important to seek professional accredited financial advice when considering whether the information is suitable to your personal circumstances. Comments provided by readers that may include information relating to tax, superannuation or other rules cannot be relied upon as advice. SuperGuide does not verify the information provided within comments from readers. Learn more

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. My wife will have worked in Australia for at least 17 years and will have lived in Australia for 22 years at pension age. However while we have had to spend some time in the UK, previously for work and recently for her families illnesses it has meant that my wife has not had one single 10 year stint of continuous residence and hence will not be eligible for any pension whatsoever till maybe 75 years old, she has never made any centrelink claims and for the whole time in Australia has spent into the economy. Thus due to the many changes which affect lots of people here, these changes will force us to live in exile as we cannot afford to live in the country I was born in and spent most of my life in under these conditions, it is a very expensive country when you live purely on your savings.

    Reply

  2. My husband and myself have had our part-age pensions cut by 50% which made a huge impact on our living standard. There is no doubt that the move to change the age-pension should have been grandfathered. It is incomprehensible that the Greens agreed to what I call a theft to living standards of old people who are no longer able to work, supposed to cope with ever increasing living costs and, in particular with ever increasing costs of health services. Is it then not the case that we, who worked all our lives and paid our taxes and whose age pensions were cut, are now paying for social benefits to those who recently arrived in this country, never worked here and were therefore never taxed? Think about it. Someone had to pay for that. And that may explain it.

    Reply

  3. I am now full of dismay. I thought I was going to have a good quality of life in early retirement but after a bit more investigating it looks very uncertain. I feel these changes have been without conscience. How can a government allow people to retire being reliant upon a pension and then simply withdraw the offer? If a change had to be made why was it not retrospectively?

    Reply

  5. What a joke. The more you earn throughout life means the more tax you pax. Then big tax payers/hard workers and savers are the ones penalised. I will be doing everything I can to reduce my assets on paper. As I was one of the people who have injected a lot of money in to the tax system much and someone that may have never worked/payed tax will receive more than me…….

    Reply

    • I totally agree, I paid plenty of tax for many years and invested when the market was down. I was fortunate, but not knowing when I am going to kick the bucket thought, well this will cover me if I lose my part pension. I was not happy but could see the situation we had been left in by the previous Government. I was quite happy to lose my pension if it was going to help other pensioners (they have not benefited by my loss). However, my husband is on a disability pension and I am treated for diabetes but I do believe we should still be able to receive the assisted benefits side under the State Government which could be reimbursed by the Commonwealth Government. We even pay for our own private health, which must save the Government for any hospital treatment.
      Being aware some time ago this could possibly happen I made arrangements for our Grandchildren to have an Internet Business using a “Trust Account”. I am happy how this is going and it allows me to pass on useful information to them on how to make money and saves us spending money on them. In my opinion people who are thinking of downsizing should not as any funds you have in excess will reduce your pension until you use a lot of it up. The tricks of the trade in the Aged Care and Retirement Village situations are ludicrous but not enough room to pass on all the information here but very sticky on accumulated exit fees from day one, capital gains percentages, lease releases also ambiguous entry contacts whether it is freehold, leasehold and other means and the tricks go on and on. Please do your own research this is my opinion only that I have researched. Thank You.

      Reply

  6. my wife and I both on the pension she works 2 days a week so we don’t get full pension how much can you earn as a couple before you pay any tax we both 67 cheers

    Reply

  7. Seniors and age pensioners can join The Seniors United Party of Australia (www.supa.org.au). SUPA is advocating on all age care issues including cuts to the age pension made by The LNP and The Greens. from 1 January 17. Seniors can also sign the following petition:
    https://www.change.org/p/jenny-macklin-it-s-time-to-protect-our-pensions-63d76bd8-18c6-4f4f-8020-e8fc18548bc8?recruiter=550430732&utm_source=share_for_starters&utm_medium=copyLink. I understand Jackie Lambie and Pauline Hanson are also against cuts to the age pension by The LNP and The Greens.

    Reply

  8. I finally reached pension age (65) last year and so became eligible for a part pension. As I’ve only been able to work part-time in recent years it was a relief to have a bit extra coming in. Received a small inheritance recently which along with my superannuation means I’m no longer eligible for even the part-pension. I’ve always been a good saver as I wanted to have a bit to live on in my later years. I’ve hardly worked since January and am paying all my living expenses from my savings – doesn’t seem right to me.

    Reply

  9. I am one of the many that lost all the pension due to having assets over the $816,000. Today received a letter from my local council telling me that as I no longer hold a pensioner concession card I am now longer entitled to receive a discount on my rates and that they are now requesting me to repay them the proportional discount allowed when I paid my annual rate bill.

    Whilst I may have some assets they are not always producing an income. My taxable income last year was less than $11,000 and I have myself and my wife to provide for.

    This really is a kick in the guts for those that made the extra effort to substantially try to reduce their burden on the taxpayer whilst in retirement. The removal of the safety net for us is a disgrace.

    Reply

  11. Yes one of the many who have saved to live a better retirement life. Pension and other recent impacts:
    – Have lost $28/ftn under 1st Jan 2017 amenedment.
    – Spouse not entitled for pension for another four years and is not working or has any income, yet as a one of a couple, I’m getting $215.90 less than single person rate. I have to provide for two people so there is an anomaly in how this applies.
    – My last indexation pension increase was plus 0.5% – every utility service etc cost going up 5+%
    – To add salt to the wound, the Vic State Govt has allowed councils to undertake house revaluations every two years instead of 3. Hence get a rate increase more often – my last one was plus 10% – what pensioner gets a 10% pay rise? And yes wrote to council, Minister and MAV and got a …’we’ll get back to you reply from each one . Not one followed through.
    – All other utilities are rising well above any increase pensioners – electricity, water, gas etc. If you have solar panels, under the revised tariff scheme effective 1st jan 2017, you lose big time – will cost me an extra $500-650 per year.

    The short of it is that anyone who has been frugal will miss out on having a better retirement, and have inadvertently provided for utilities and governments (via GST payments) the opportunity to pick their savings clean.

    Reply

    • Would your wife be able to get onto Newstart and maybe volunteer at a local op shop or other similar charity place to help satisfy the relevant Newstart criteria?
      This may help your finances. Good luck!

      Reply

  12. Cheryl, Maria, Jay and all the others who have written (and all those who have not written but intended to) about the recent changes to their pension payments, pleases keep up the anger. Keep this anger going until at least the next election and then vote to show your anger and contempt. Liberals, Labour and the Greens most certainly do not deserve our support and our votes. They are relying on the belief that we will, over time, forget what they have done to us. What politicians like Pauline Hansen, Nick Xenophon and other Independents say is at times irrelevant and not main stream, but maybe we need them in Parliament to provide a balance to the hypocritical and self-serving main Parties.

    Reply

    • That is so right! We must not let those asset test/pension changes just be forgotten. Rumour has it that even more restrictions will be put on getting an aged pension in the near future. Even if they had to change the asset test figures, to enable pensions to be sustained for a longer period, I feel that they should have been grandfathered for those already retired. It is not likely that most retired over 65’s would be able to find, and keep, a job to help balance out the amount they have lost in these asset test changes. Maintain the rage!

      Reply

  13. Why has something not been done about cutting the age pension. Nobody is listening. My husband and myself worked past the retirement age. We only had small savings but had paid a bit extra, not a lot into superannuation. We received only a small part pension for a few months now that has been taken away. I only wish I had left work earlier spent spent spent and did not think I was doing the right thing by saving in super. My advice don’t work past 65 years and enjoy life while you can and spend.
    Margaret

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SuperGuide