3 Comments

  1. Elle

    I turned 60 june 2007 am retired, sold my large house down graded invested spare money into my super believing I would be making $25.000 per year till age 65 one month after I invested I lost $50.000 just like that.

    I would like to know what the chances of the government increasing the cut off for this Super Scheme from 65 to maybe 67 to give those of us that did this a chance to recover some of the money lost and make a little.

    Saying this I would like to remind that Government has already legislated that retirement age is going up gradually anyway.

    would love some feed back regarding this.

  2. David

    My tax return shows that a married aged pensioner who’s wife is under aged pension but receiving partnet allowance does not receive the benifit of the wifes SATO benifit, and at the same time his SATO is reduced to $24680.00.
    It seems as though a married pensioner and a single pensioner paying tax at the single rate are assesed differently.
    If a married pensioner receives no benifit from his wife under SATO he should be taxed as a single person…this would raise his threshold to $29867.00…thank you

One Trackback/Pingback

  1. Working longer reaps tax benefits for over-55s

    [...] No tax in retirement because you SATO [...]

Leave a comment

market
Our free monthly email features all the latest information, Q&As, and tips about super.

Latest newsletter | Previous newsletters

Why I started SuperGuide

marketHi - I'm Trish Power and I am the author of Superannuation For Dummies and many other books on super and investing.

And guess what! This site, SuperGuide, is the only INDEPENDENT website for consumers on superannuation in Australia. Read more

Advertisement

market
For the latest tweets on superannuation, follow SuperGuide on Twitter.

Confused by super?

Advertisement

Superannuation Q&As

View some previous questions that readers have sent in.