Note: SuperGuide updates this article periodically with the latest performance and super fund data. Latest update was 25 February 2012.
Asking experts and rating agencies for the answer to what super fund is Australia’s best-performing fund can be compared to the vain stepmother in the fairy tale Snow White asking the magical mirror: ‘Mirror mirror on the wall, who in the land is the fairest of all?”. The answer on one day may be: “You, my queen, are fairest of all” while another day it is likely to be: “Queen, you are full fair, ’tis true, but Snow White is fairer than you.”
The dilemma when seeking out ‘the best’ is that the answer also depends on who you’re asking, what you’re asking, and even when you’re asking such a question. Do you want to know the top performer for the past month, three months, 12 months, or the top fund over a period of 3 years, 5 years or 10 years? Are you seeking the best performer before fees, or after fees? Do you want to know the best performer after taxes have been deducted, or after both fees and taxes have been deducted?
Are you comparing like with like? For instance, a super fund investment option that invests only in cash investments will usually have a very different investment return to a super fund investment option that invests 100% of its money in Australian shares or international shares.
Alternatively, when you’re thinking of the best fund, you may be seeking a fund that provides the cheapest fees, or the best value life insurance or the most flexible pension options.
Every month, and each quarter, the daily newspapers report the top-performing super funds for the month or quarter. The data is usually sourced from one of the rating agencies, including:
- Chant West
- SuperRatings
- SelectingSuper
- MorningStar.
You then need to differentiate the top-performing funds from what rating agencies consider to be the ‘best’ super funds. The ‘best’ super fund tag applied by a rating agency is not necessarily the super fund with the highest performance in a particular year or month, and what is ‘best’ can vary depending on what is used as a measurement.
How did your super fund perform?
In this article we publish some exciting information for those readers interested in hard data on the top all-rounder super funds, and the winners in the investment performance stakes, courtesy of rating company, SuperRatings. Continue reading to discover the following information:
- Super fund of the year for 2012 (across both super accumulation and pension drawdown phases)
- Top 10 super funds in Australia (based on 400 criteria including investment, fees, insurance, service delivery) for accumulation phase, including the winning super fund
- Top 10 pension funds in Australia, including the winning pension fund
- Top 10 super fund performers (balanced investment option) for 5 years to June 2011
- Top 10 super fund performers (balanced investment option) for 5 years to December 2011
Note: You can also read about the latest performance figures over 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years for the different investment options available, and the latest data on the top-performing super funds in the article Investment performance: We’re the best super fund. No we’re the best…
Tip: If you run a self-managed super fund (SMSF) you can use the investment returns of the large super funds as a benchmark for your own fund’s investment performance. Are you outperforming the large super funds with your asset allocation?
And the award goes to…
On 11 October 2011, ratings agency SuperRatings, announced the Super Fund of the Year for 2012 (across both accumulation phase and pension phase), and the top super fund (accumulation) and the top pension fund for 2012.
The winner of SuperRatings’ Fund of the Year for 2012 is SunSuper. According to SuperRatings, SunSuper is the best value for money fund on an aggregated basis, across both superannuation accumulation and pension drawdown phases.
The winners for the separate awards of top super fund and top pension fund are detailed below.
Top 10 super funds
SuperRatings evaluated hundreds of super funds based on based on 400 different criteria (including investments; fees; insurance; service delivery; member education; financial planning facilities; employer support; and fund governance).
In alphabetical order, the top 10 finalists for top super fund (accumulation phase) for 2012 are:
- AustralianSuper
- CareSuper
- Catholic Super
- HESTA Super
- HOSTPLUS
- InTrust Super
- NGS Super
- REST
- Sunsuper
- Telstra Super
And the winner is… Telstra Super. According to SuperRatings, “… improvements to insurance, a realignment of fees, consistently strong investment performance and an exceptional financial advice model saw them as deserved winners this year”.
Top 10 pension funds
In alphabetical order, the top ten pension funds for 2012 are:
- AMP Flexible Super Retirement Pension
- AUSCOAL Super Account Based Pension
- AustralianSuper Pension
- Catholic Super Pension
- Club Plus Pension
- HOSTPLUS Pension
- OnePath OneAnswer Frontier Pension
- Russell Private Active Pension
- Sunsuper Retirement Pension
- Vision Super Allocated Pension
And the winner is… Catholic Super Pension. According to SuperRatings, “…with excellent short and long term investment performance, competitive fees, strong product flexibility and a dedicated pension service centre, it provides exceptional value for members”.
Taking a balanced approach – investment performance
If you’re looking solely at investment performance, then the ‘best’ fund award depends on what type of investment option is involved, and whether you are looking at performance over 12 months, 3 years, 5 years or even 10 years.
More than 80% of Australians have their super money invested in a balanced (sometimes described as ‘growth’) investment option, which generally involves between 60% and 80% of growth-style assets, such as shares and property, and 30% to 40% in more conservative investments, such as cash and fixed interest. Some ‘balanced’ investment options resemble ‘growth’ options, holding 80% or more of assets in growth-style investments.
For example, SuperRatings classifies a ‘balanced’ investment option to be holding 60% to 76% in growth investments while another rating agency, ChantWest, classifies ‘Balanced’ to be an investment option with 41-60% of assets in growth investments. Chant West considers an allocation of 61 to 80% in growth assets to be a ‘growth’ option.
In short, the terms ‘balanced’ and ‘growth’ are sometimes interchangeable, and you should always check the asset mix of any investment option that you’re considering or that you currently use. Your super fund’s default investment option is likely to be a balanced or growth allocation.
The two tables below list the top 10-performing balanced options within super funds for:
- 5-year period to 30 June 2011
- 5-year period to 31 December 2011
Note: Displaying performance figures for different timeframes (for example, to June 2011, and to December 2011) highlights the fact that a particular super fund may be the top performer in one period and further down the performance list in another period. The difference in the 5-year average returns between the June 2011 figures and the December 2011 figures highlights the current volatility of the markets. The key when measuring the performance of a super fund is consistent long-term returns over extended periods which means the best long-term performer over longer periods may not necessarily be the top performer in any one or more periods.
Top 10 balanced options over 5-year period to 30 June 2011
According to SuperRatings, the top 10 super funds based on the ‘balanced’ option (investment options with between 60% and 76% in growth-style assets) over the 5-year period ending 30 June 2011 are:
| Top 10 Balanced (60-76) – annual returns for 5 years as at 30 June 2011 | ||||
| Fund Investment Option | Option Type | Return Period | Return (% p.a) | Rank |
| CBA OSF Super – Mix 70 | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 4.9% | 1 |
| REST – Core Strategy | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 4.6% | 2 |
| Catholic Super – Balanced | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 4.3% | 3 |
| Club Plus Super – Balanced Option | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 4.2% | 4 |
| NGS Super Diversified | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 4.1% | 5 |
| LGSuper Accum – Balanced | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 3.9% | 6 |
| Local Super – Growth Option | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 3.8% | 7 |
| CareSuper –Balanced** | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 3.7% | 8 |
| Buss (Q) –Balanced Growth | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 3.7% | 9 |
| Telstra Super Corp Plus – Balanced | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 3.6% | 10 |
Table note: All results are net of fees and tax and are for the 5 years ended 30 June 2011. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
**Interim results
Source: SuperRatings
Note: If you have actively chosen an investment option, then your super money may not be in a balanced investment option. You will need to do a little more research to uncover the performance data for super funds that have invested in a similar asset allocation to yourself.
SuperRatings provides some performance data (free of charge) on super funds and pension funds. You can visit the SuperRatings website (www.superatings.com.au) for more information.
Top 10 balanced options over 5-year period to 31 December 2011
According to SuperRatings, the top 5 super funds based on the ‘balanced’ option (investment options with between 60% and 76% in growth-style assets) over the 5-year period ending 31 December 2011 are:
| Top 10 Balanced (60-76) – annual returns for 5 years as at 31 December 2011 | ||||
| Fund Investment Option | Option Type | Return Period | Return (% p.a) | Rank |
| CBA OSF Super – Mix 70 | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 3.0% | 1 |
| LGSuper Accum – Conservative Balanced | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 2.9% | 2 |
| REST – Core Strategy | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 2.2% | 3 |
| FSS- Health Super Division-Medium-Term Growth | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 2.2% | 4 |
| CareSuper –Balanced** | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 1.7% | 5 |
| Catholic Super – Balanced | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 1.7% | 6 |
| Buss (Q) –Balanced Growth | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 1.6% | 7 |
| NGS Super Diversified | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 1.5% | 8 |
| Local Super – Growth Option | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 1.4% | 9 |
| TasPlan – Balanced | Balanced (60-76) | 5 year | 1.1% | 10 |
Table note: All results are net of fees and tax and are for the 5 years ended 31 December 2011. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
Source: SuperRatings


Hi Trish
Im in the process of doing a investment switch. Im currently with Perpetual and im wondering are they a good company to be dealing with. I feel that their fees are a bit high. based on an investment amount of $302,372 the MER amount is $6,569 plus a monthly admin fee of $8.44. What are you thoughts on this matter.
Regards
Doug.
Hi Doug – I’ve answered your question here:
http://www.superguide.com.au/superannuation-basics/super-for-beginners-part-11-is-my-super-fund-good-enough
Regards, Trish
Hi Trish
You have the best superannuation content, website & writing style found on the internet (by me)!
Not a glib comment considered I’ve been online since ’96 – so congratulations.
Suggestion – when ranking super funds and reading super tables – may I suggest we start with the greater period 5, 7 or 10 years in the column closest to the left ie
10 7 5 3 2 1 etc and rank performance by the greatest period.
I believe there is a psychological benefit in that you’ll be educating your readership that long term performance is superior to short term performance.
Hi Stephen
Many thanks for awarding SuperGuide ‘your best superannuation content’ award. We accept with pleasure!
I agree with your comments about focusing on the long-term returns when creating performance tables and ranking super funds. When we next update these articles, or write news ones on this topic, we will ensure that we show the longest period first and ranking.
Regards
Trish
great site –very informative,thank you
Finally!!! Fantastic site!!!! After searching and searching the internet for superannuation information/advise I have finally stumbled onto your very informative site, thank you so much.
Hi Simone
Many thanks for your kind feedback. We are very proud of our site and chuffed that you find SuperGuide helpful.
Regards
Trish
Hi Trish
Would Vic Super or ESS Super have been included in the research for the best Super Fund – if so any idea where they finished?
Regards
David
Hi David
I believe VicSuper were involved in the survey but I am unable to access this information. You could ask VicSuper and they may tell you as a fund member. At the very least, you can compare Vicsuper’s results on the VicSuper website
By the way, APRA is going to release a report later today with the performance figures for the largest 200 funds up to 30 June 2011 – it was too late for the February 2012 newsletter.
Regards
Trish