How much do your super fund trustees get paid?

Note: This article includes the remuneration data and related party transactions for major industry super funds (Cbus, HESTA, AustralianSuper and CareSuper). We update this article periodically when additional super funds disclose the salary packages of executives or trustee directors. If you have previously read the introduction to this article, then head to the second half of the article for the lowdown on remuneration for the key staff and directors of these super funds. Article last updated 17 October 2012.

In an industry first, one of Australia’s largest super funds has disclosed what its top executives, and its board of trustees receive, individually, in salary and other financial benefits.

Congratulations Cbus, industry fund for the building and construction industry, for taking a leadership role in disclosing executive and director pay, and also for disclosing related party and sponsorship arrangements. The details of salary levels for Cbus executives and trustee directors are set out at the end of the article.

Other super funds are expected to follow with full disclosure of remuneration for top executives and board of trustees. When they do disclose this information, we will update this article with this data. Since first publishing this article, HESTA, AustralianSuper and CareSuper have also disclosed remuneration data. This article is now updated with the figures for these super funds.

Note: SMSF trustees cannot accept payment for acting as trustee of a self-managed super fund.

It has always bemused me that multi-billion dollar financial organisations such as superannuation funds can produce consumer-friendly marketing documents and present them as annual reports. From a pragmatic point of view, there is definitely a struggle to balance bombarding fund members with important but complex information, while also engaging readers with limited but more readable information.

As marketing and communication tools, the annual reports to fund members, produced by most super funds, are useful for fund members to get a better grasp of what is happening to their superannuation savings, and to highlight major changes to the super laws that may affect fund members. Many years ago I was involved in helping to write these reports and they certainly serve an important role informing and education fund members. Such reports however do not function as financial analysis tools for consumers, journalists and rating companies to analyse the operational effectiveness of the organisation.

The major gap in the reports produced by most super funds is that there is no information available on what actually happens to the fees that these super funds charge to members. The information supplied in the current version of annual reports does not enable fund members to decide whether the super fund can justify the level of fees when compared with other super funds operating in the same space. Rating companies help fill this information gap, but members should at least receive a fee breakdown, and where those fees end up, for their own super fund.

Note: I understand that many super funds now permit some access to official financial accounts. In many cases, a fund member can request access to the full audited financial accounts, but they need to contact the super fund directly.

Cbus remuneration: 2011/2012 annual report

Set out below is the remuneration data extracted from the 2011/2012 Cbus annual report. Cbus looks after nearly $19 billion of retirement savings for just under 700,000 Australians. Similar information from some other major super funds will also be published when it becomes available.

Note: We will not be publishing any reader comments that seek to criticise the level of pay a particular Cbus director or executive has received. SuperGuide’s intention in reproducing the remuneration of Cbus directors and executives is not to make them a target for personal criticism, but to help fulfil the purpose of full disclosure and to expand the discussion on greater transparency. High-level roles do command high incomes because large super funds need to ensure they secure suitably skilled and qualified staff, and super funds do compete with other financial organisations for quality employees. On that point, whether retail super funds follow the lead of Cbus is questionable, considering the salaries of banking executives, who often sit on retail super fund boards, are likely to make your eyes boggle.

Cbus has committed $40 million on an administration platform upgrade, as part owner of administration service provider, SuperPartners. Cbus also spent $1.4 million of members’ funds on sponsorship deals, primarily in partnership with related unions and other employee associations.

Table 1: Cbus top executives – total remuneration packages
Executive Position Total remuneration packages
David Atkin Chief Executive Officer (CEO) $500,000
Chris Altis Executive Manager, Marketing and Communications $219,450
Maria Butera Executive Manager, Workplace Distribution $242,650
Trish Donohue Executive Manager, Investments $379,800
Sean Leonard Executive Manager, Product Strategy and Strategic IT $258,159
Johanna Neilsen Executive Manager, People & Culture $168,000
Stephen Spiller Executive Manager, Organisational Strategy and Service Delivery $232,100
Angela Thurstans* Executive Manager, Governance and Risk $213,000
Keith Wells-Janz Executive Manager, Finance $273,337

*A. Thurstans is paid 0.8 FTE of the full-time package indicated.

Table 2: Cbus trustee board and board committee fees
Trustee Director Sponsoring organisation Fees* paid to Total fees paid
Steve Bracks ACTU Director $105,907
John Dawkins Independent Appointed May 2012 Nil
W Harnisch Master Builders Association (MBA) MBA $78,198
J Haskins MBA Director $44,661
P Kennedy MBA Director $82,553
G Thompson AMWU AMWU $55,199
S Benyon MBA Director $38,381
G Kearney ACTU ACTU $23,852
R Mallia CFMEU CFMEU $31,997
A McDonald MBA Director $40,407
C Melham AWU Director $48,816
J Murray MBA Director $46,891
D Noonan CFMEU CFMEU $46,790
F O’Grady CFMEU CFMEU $32,099
P Smith MBA Director $48,918
P Tighe MBA CEPU $38,381
Alternate Director
T Ayres AMWU AMWU $4,255

*Fees paid personally to directors, or to the MBA, or to various unions (in relation to 7 of the directors).

HESTA remuneration: 2011/2012 annual report

Set out below is the remuneration data and related party information extracted from the 2011/2012 HESTA annual report. HESTA has not disclosed the remuneration packages for its top executives. HESTA looks after $20 billion of retirement savings for 750,000 Australians. Similar information from some other major super funds will also be published when it becomes available.

HESTA has relationships with the following service providers:

  • HESTA has a 30% share in asset consultants, Frontier Investments and HESTA paid Frontier $2.34 million in fees. The chair of HESTA, Angela Emslie, is also the chair of Frontier Investments.
  • HESTA owns 17% of administration services company, SuperPartners, and This company provides administration to HESTA.
  • HESTA owns 16% in Industry Super Holdings which includes subsidiaries, Industry Funds Management (IFM looks after $3.4 billion of HESTA’s investment pool), Industry Fund Services (IFS provides financial planning services to HESTA members), and Industry Fund Services Insurance Broking (IFSIB provides insurance services to HESTA).
  • HESTA owns 17% of ME Bank, and ME Bank manages the Super Member Home Loans program and the Super Loans Trust, and HESTA had $250 million in cash held with Me Bank.
  • HESTA’s chair, Angela Emslie is partner of Garry Weaven. Garry Weaven is on the board of ISH, ME Bank and Chair of IFM.
  • HESTA owns 3.7% of ISPT, which is the trustee and manager of four unlisted direct investment property trusts which HESTA invests in ($1 billion).
Table 3: HESTA trustee board and board committee fees
Trustee Director Sponsoring organisation Fees* paid to Total fees paid
A C Emslie (Chair) ACTU Director $76,030
B H Holmes (Deputy Chair) ANF NSW Nurses Association $47,646
J A Bonnington Catholic Health Australia Director $43,705
G L Bunney ACSA Director $20,448
Y M Chaperon ANF Australian Nursing Federation (ANF) $42,425
R J A Elliott HSU Director $13,463
K Jackson HSU Director $10,288
R Kelly HSU Medical Scientists Association $20,928
T D Lyons ACTU ACTU $36,015
E R Mohle ANF Queensland Nurses Union $40,073
M S O’Halloran ACSS DirectorWelfare Rights Centre $19,845$22,000
P H Power AHHA Director $32,410
R N Royle APHA Uniting Care Health $38,573
K L Shay United Voice United Voice WA $29,780
A J Smith ACAA AJ&BJ Smith P/L $40,345
D Smith (alternate director) ASU Australian Services Union $19,785
L Williams HSU Health &Community Services Union $19,205
K Zimmerman ACSA Director $16,470
Total director fees     $589,794

*Fees paid personally to directors, or to various associations, or to various unions

AustralianSuper remuneration: 2011/2012 annual report

Set out below is limited remuneration data extracted from the 2011/2012 AustralianSuper annual report. AustralianSuper looks after $46 billion of retirement savings for 1.9 million Australians. AustralianSuper has not disclosed related party transactions in the annual report, but will make this information available in early November 2012 when the audited financial statements become available. We will publish this information when it becomes available.

Table 4: AustralianSuper top 5 remunerated managers
Executive Position Total remuneration packages
Ian Silk Chief Executive Officer (CEO) $586,767
Mark Delaney Deputy CEO and Chief Investments Officer $560,041*
Peter Curtis Head of Investment Operations and Service $365,531*
Jason Peasley Head of Infrastructure $347,000*
Innes McKeand Head of Equities $346,931*

*No bonuses were paid to investment staff due to not meeting all performance objectives

Table 5: AustralianSuper trustee board and board committee fees
Trustee Director Sponsoring organisation Fees* paid to Total fees paid
E Rubin (Chair) ACTU Undisclosed $160,984
J Ingram (Deputy Chair) Ai Group Undisclosed $81,750
L Di Bartolomeo Ai Group Undisclosed $36,406
B Daley ACTU Undisclosed $66,926
P Howes ACTU Undisclosed $50,358
J Lawrence ACTU Undisclosed $33,136
S McGurk ACTU Undisclosed $74,120
D Oliver ACTU Undisclosed $25,615
T Poole Ai Group Undisclosed $112,815
H Ridout Ai Group Undisclosed $29,866
A Terry Ai Group Undisclosed $40,654
G Willis Ai Group Undisclosed $72,812
Alternate Directors      
N Apple ACTU Undisclosed $27,250
P Burn Ai Group Undisclosed $23,980
P Grant Undisclosed Undisclosed $3,238
L O’Brien ACTU Undisclosed $19,838
G Stamas Ai Group Undisclosed $4,283
R Symons Undisclosed Undisclosed $5,832
D Whiteley ACTU Undisclosed $16,568
Non-Director Committee Members      
G Ashton n/a Undisclosed $50,358
L Jerkovic n/a Undisclosed $5,559
M Nicolaides n/a Undisclosed $9,156
B Watchorn n/a Undisclosed $8,884

*Fees paid personally to directors, or to various associations, or to various unions

CareSuper remuneration: 2011/2012 annual report

Set out below is remuneration data and related party transactions extracted from the 2011/2012 CareSuper annual report. CareSuper looks after $4.6 billion of retirement savings for 180,000 Australians.

Table 6: CareSuper trustee board and board committee fees
Trustee Director Sponsoring organisation Fees* paid to Total fees paid
Sandy Grant (Chair) Undisclosed (employer group) Undisclosed $55,836
Cate Wood (Deputy Chair) ASU Undisclosed $48,945
Michael O’Sullivan ASU Undisclosed $54,415
Sue-Anne Burnley SDA Undisclosed $39,212
Michael Want ASU Undisclosed $40,766
Barry Watchorn Ai Group Undisclosed $51,732
John Burge NIBA Undisclosed $41,105
Angela Emslie VECCI Undisclosed $40,425
Gabriel Szondy Independent Self $40,617

CareSuper has relationships with the following service providers:

  • Shareholder of ME Bank. CareSuper holds investments with ME Bank.
  • Shareholder of Industry Super Holdings (ISH), and Industry Funds Management (IFM) and Industry Fund Services are subsidiaries of ISH. CareSuper holds investments with IFM.
  • CareSuper trustee chairman, Sandy Grant, held a directorship in another organisation in which CareSuper invests, namely he was a director of IFS.
  • CareSuper trustee directors, Cate Wood (deputy chair) and John Burge both held directorships on two related bodies representing CareSuper interests, namely Industry Super Property Trust and ISPT Grosvenor International Property Trust.
How much do your super fund trustees get paid?   Super Guide

Comments

  1. Good to see this financial information printed. I think what the general public needs to take into consideration that most of those directors paid less than $50k aren’t just necessarily earning only this money. These amounts would generally represent what is paid to them for what meetings they turn up to. They may earn other monies from other directorships or jobs.
    The overall objection I have to industry fund reporting is that these type of wages are paid out of profits made by the fund and then they allocate the net amount as the investment return to the members. In other words they aren’t really being told what is being earned by their fund on their own investment. And don’t get me started on the amount of advertising these funds indulge in.
    It just means members don’t get told what their total costs are that are being wiped off the top. You can’t expect the members to read the annual accounts to understand this. And I didn’t think they paid financial advisors? They pay for financial managers and so this is just marketing spin again, trying to tug on the heart strings of their members

  2. Please send this info. to Four Corners.

  3. Industry funds have been the greatest success of the trade union movement in recent memory. It’s good to see C+Bus taking the lead, as they did when industry super was in its infancy.

    I wonder if the private sector funds will follow their lead. I won’t hold my breath.

    • Totally agree Trevor – It’s great to see Industry Funds step forward and show the members in plain context what us members are paying for. I’ve always found industry funds very good (except of course for the losses incurred during the GFC) however, Superannuation was only part of the iceburg.
      I must admit that I’m extremely keen to see (in clear dollars) what the “faces” on TV recieve to promote the Industry Superannuation funds!!! In saying this, I do understand that high profile individuals are required for marketing purposes, but at what expense to the member?
      One last comment is that as a Industry Fund member, it’s terrific that Funds are being more forthcoming and terefore sites such as “superguide” allow us individuals to access such information.
      “Those private funds ought to take a step forward and if there is nothing to hide, then why not disclose info openly”.

  4. Is there not some conflict of interest in the structure of HESTA and its relationships???

    Irrespective of performance these cosy partnerships where billions are involved must cease as there is an obvious perception of conflict of interest; nay nepotism.

  5. Hi Trish,
    Guess there is more to come. It’s time these superannuation fund officials were exposed giving members and the public an insight into who gets what and who’s with who. Hope it hits four corners.

  6. With HESTA, you can see there is nothing like keeping these things in the family…lol… wonder if they can spell “corporate governance”?
    I guess their members might be happy enough if their cosy relationship meant the performance was in the “top ten”, but I didn’t see it there.

Leave a Comment

*